tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28244882.post5057531480389811539..comments2024-03-05T17:54:53.307+10:00Comments on Malum Nalu: 'OC report sneaked into Parliament'Malum Naluhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17513608976714683688noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28244882.post-30526962754788830432010-03-12T18:26:04.077+10:002010-03-12T18:26:04.077+10:00The OC carried out their investigation in good fai...The OC carried out their investigation in good faith and found a prima facie case against the PM and others for obstructing justice. It should now go to the Public Prosecutor for a full legal investigation. If there is insufficient evidence for prosecution, than that is OK and due process has been followed. It is TRUE that the PM refused to give evidence and forbade some of his senior officials from giving evidence. This is very suspicious in itself. And the fact remains that numerous PNG laws were broken (as detailed by Sir Mek yesterday), which is completely separate from Moti's court case in Australia.<br /><br />The Defence Inquiry into Moti's escape 2 yrs ago found out pretty much the same thing, and expressed it in even stronger words. This first report was never tabled in Parliament and the PNG media has been gagged by the PM from quoting it - although it is available on-line.<br /><br />How can a report be tabled in Parliament "illegally"? Who is in control of Parliamentary procedures? This argument is a joke. Did Manek just sneak into the building at night and deposit the report on everyone's desks?<br /><br />It was tabled BY THE SPEAKER! It was considered and voted upon UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SPEAKER!<br /><br />To claim it was "sneaked in by the back door" makes as much sense as the child who said to the teacher "the dog ate my homework sir!"<br /><br />Somare is senile.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com