Thursday, July 08, 2010

Kumuls must get ready for four nations' rugby league meet

By REGINALD RENAGI

 

The Papua New Guinea Rugby League administration must now get its act together to sort out the legal impasse or forget about PNG's participation in the forthcoming four nation rugby league tournament this October.

Time may be running out for the PNG Kumuls and PNG must also be concerned for several reasons.

While we stuff around, the Australian and New Zealand organisers of this important meet are also watching, and wondering whether PNG will be ready for this planned tournament.

We should not let the threat of resignation by Kumul coach Adrian Lam force us to come to a compromised decision that will destroy the integrity and long-term sustainability of rugby league in this country.

Let the rugby league administration now decide what is good for the development of rugby league in PNG.

What we decide now must be long in vision and mission, whether we are preparing for the four nations meet four months from now or the Australian NRL Bid proposal.

There is an urgent need for the Kumuls to must start preparing now or PNG may not be sufficiently prepared for this year's four nation tournament.

 Adrian Lam is the best Kumuls' coach so far, and it will be a shame if he was to step down as the Kumul's coach.

 Lam values his professional credibility more than the silly games the league administration is currently embroiled in at this moment.

The PNG Rugby League Administration's lack of clear direction has now prompted Sports Minister Philemon Embel to personally take matters into his own hand to try to resolve the legal impasse (which will no doubt drag on for some time, and time is what we cannot afford right now).

The Sports Minister must be commended for his foresight and quick action here.

 It's somewhat surprising to see the Sports Federation not taking a more-proactive action here to directly address the situation early until the resignation threat by Adrian Lam as recently reported in the media.

Last Saturday's meeting at Port Moresby's Crown Plaza hotel organised by the Sports Minister for all rugby league stakeholders to meet and resolve the present impasse has a temporary but a positive outcome. 

The meeting decided to have a caretaker rugby league administration in place until the court decides who the rightful rugby league board is. 

This is a positive start. 

What are really needed now are a good strong leadership and management within the PNG Rugby League administration to take the rugby league code forward into the future.

We must do this without any undue political and external interference to make decisions that will only compromise the growth and sustainability of this popular sporting code in PNG.

 

Reginald Renagi

*Former President, Defence Force Rugby League and Union

 

Integrity law thrown out

THE law that has regulated the conduct of Members of Parliament has been thrown out, prompting speculations moves were being made to overthrow Prime Minister Sir Michael Somare, The National reports.

In a unanimous ruling, the Supreme Court yesterday declared unconstitutional parts of the Organic Law on the Integrity of Political Parties and Candidates (OLIPPAC) that place restrictions on MPs when they vote for the prime minister, the budget, any constitutional laws, and whether they want to remain within a political party or change allegiance.

The five-judge bench, chaired by Chief Justice Sir Salamo Injia, upheld all the 12 questions raised by Western Governor Dr Bob Danaya, whose provincial government filed the challenge in court.

While this decision effectively ruled those particular sections raised by Danaya as null and void; every other section of the OLIPPAC remained intact, the court said.

Sir Salamo, who read out the decision, said the bench held that “any Organic Law relating to section(s) 50 Rights of the Constitution must be regulated and not restrict or prohibit” MPs of their democratic rights, as had been done by the OLIPPAC.

Sir Salamo said their ruling concentrated on five central issues, relating to MPs’ democratic rights of movements from political parties and their rights or choices to vote in parliamentary decision relating to:

* The retracting of MPs from one political party to another – at will – in the best interest of their constituencies;

* The voting of a prime minister;

* Voting on the national budget; and

* Casting their votes to the enacting of a law or repealing of a constitutional law.

He said the restrictions imposed on Members of Parliament were “unheard of in any democratic countries within the Commonwealth”.

In its 96-page decision handed down yesterday morning, the five-judge bench comprising Sir Salamo, his deputy Gibbs Salika and justices Bernard Sakora, Nicholas Kirriwom and Les Gavara-Nanu stated that “the Fly River provincial government filed a special reference under section 19 of the Constitution seeking the Supreme Court’s opinion on the interpretation and application of various provisions of the Constitution and the OLIPPAC. 

Provisions rendered invalid by the court are as follows:

* Constitution, ss12 (4) and 114, only to the extent that they authorise an Organic Law to restrict and prohibit the exercise of a Member of Parliament’s right under s50(1)(e) of the Constitution; and

* OLIPPAC, ss 65, 66, 67, 70 (3), 72 (2), 73 (1) (a) & (2).

Yesterday’s decision, in effect, meant that should a vote of no-confidence in the government is tabled, all MPs are at liberty to move to whichever side of the Parliament they wish to vote with.

They are no longer prohibited to stick to the party they are registered with. They can change political parties at will; they can vote on free will at enactments or repeals of enacted policies or vote on budgets.

“Not being able to do so is a thing of the past,” Loani Henao, lawyer for Danaya and the Fly River government, said soon after the decision.

Following the decision, the opposition issued a statement calling on MPs to join them to topple the prime minister.

Sources told The National talks were underway with different factions of the government and the opposition to remove Sir Michael and form a new government.

“They (talks) have been happening. They would intensify with the decision out now,” a source in Waigani said.

The source said the prime minister was also meeting with key figures of his government to ponder their next move.

Opposition: Join us oust Somare

THE opposition has welcomed the Supreme Court decision to nullify parts of the integrity laws and called on government members to join in the move to remove the government of Prime Minister Sir Michael Somare, The National reports.

Deputy leader and Lae MP Bart Philemon said the Organic Law on the Integrity of Political Parties and Candidates (OLIPPAC) was good for political stability, but had contributed to government using its numbers to stream-roll everything through Parliament.

“A lot of things that had been done by the government were highly questionable including the forestry amendments, proposed Ombudsman Commission amendments and the Environment law amendments,” Philemon said.

“The shackles that lead us, once you vote for the prime minister, you vote for government and, once you vote for the budget, you vote for government, have been removed.”

Philemon said now Members of Parliament could stand on principles to vote with conscience and not on money.

“We wanted to remove the government because the government had lost its way.”

He said there were outstanding issues including Moti saga, misuse of agriculture development funds, Taiwan scandal, Singapore’s K40 million scandal and the increase in the number of

ministries to 32.

“If you want to change this kind of tyranny and kitchen cabinet, we invite the 34 on the government to join us to change government.”

Philemon made the commitment that, for stability, the new government would go back and try and fix the areas pointed out by the Supreme Court without infringing the Constitution.

He was flanked by former prime minister and New Ireland Governor Sir Julius Chan, Kairuku-Hiri MP Paru Aihi, Imbonggu MP Francis Awesa, Mendi MP Isaac Joseph, Markham MP Koni Iguan, Tewai-Siassi MP Vincent Michaels and Bulolo MP Sam Basil.

Awesa, in backing Philemon, said the OLIPPAC had virtually held MPs as prisoners in their respective party.

“We, in the last eight years, have been subject to a mini-dictatorship and that has been removed.

“It is time for right-thinking leaders on the other side to stand up and be counted.”

Sir Julius said it took the court a long time to correct an unconstitutional legislation.

“Now, they (MPs) are truly free because, sometimes, they voted against their own conscience.

“This is your chance to correct the mistakes and to put the country back on course.

“The victory is not for us MPs, but for the people.”

 

 

Kavo ousted as governor

KEREMA MP Pitom Bombom was elected as the new governor for Gulf yesterday afternoon at the Gulf assembly in Kerema, an election that took place despite a court action filed in the Waigani National Court, The National reports.

Incumbent governor Havila Kavo showed up with five appointed assembly members.

But there was confusion as to what happened, and whether there were one, or two sittings yesterday.

According to one report, nine LLG presidents, Kikori MP Mark Maipakai and Kerema MP Bombom were present and elected Bombom as governor.

But a spokesman for Kavo said last night said Kavo had called for an assembly sitting at 2pm but the other faction did not show up.

“After having waited for almost 30 minutes for other ‘faction’ members to enter, Kavo as chairman adjourned the sitting to Aug 13 while all members rose and exited the chambers,” Kavo’s spokesman said.

He said when they were all out, the other party entered the chamber where they carried out the no-confidence motion.

But a spokesman for Bombom said the vote was carried out, and when Kavo lost, he stormed out with his team.

During this meeting, court papers of an appearance last Friday was served on those present.

Wednesday, July 07, 2010

Funds released for anti-retroviral treatment

National AIDS Council chairman Sir Peter Barter has thanked Prime Minister Sir Michael Somare and Health Minister Sasa Zibe for the release of K6 million which will be used to purchase and administer treatment for those people infected with HIV for the remainder of 2010.  

Although it was announced at the National Youth Debate held at the Divine Word University in Madang recently that funds had been approved for this purpose, the actual money has now been received and both the Department of Health and the National Aids Council Secretariat are engaged in ensuring these funds are used immediately to ensure the continuation of treatment for those under treatment as well as those expected to be infected in the future, in particular for children and pregnant women.

Sir Peter said the NAC had also requested that provision be made within the 2011 budget for funds to be made available so treatment could continue into the future as it was now time that Papua New Guinea took ownership of the challenge to ultimately eradicate HIV completely from the country, which could only be done by collectively working together and through effective coordination. 

“I am sure that the release of funds will convince our donor partners that the GoPNG is genuinely concerned, and that the release of funds will restore credibility with those donors, including the Global Fund, that we and all stakeholders will do all possible to prevent the spread of HIV in PNG,” he said.

 

Is China sending convicts to Papua New Guinea? Almost certainly!

From Japan Times Online

 

Monday, July 5, 2010


China now exports its convicts

 

By BRAHMA CHELLANEY

 

Relieving pressure on overcrowded national prisons by employing convicts as laborers at Chinese-run projects in the developing world is a novel strategy China has adopted — an approach that is certain to create new backlashes against Chinese businesses overseas, besides highlighting the country's egregious human-rights record.

In addition to being the world's biggest executioner, China has one of the largest prison populations in the world.

 The 2009 "World Prison Population List" compiled by the International Center for Prison Studies at King's College, London, put the total number of inmates in Chinese jails at 1.57 million.

China has evolved in important ways as a result of its economic "opening," with the new social pluralism prompting the state to cut back on totalitarian practices. Yet, with its Soviet-style autocratic structure intact, there is little space for political pluralism. Those who challenge government policies or practices or stage demonstrations against official highhandedness risk long imprisonment.

The forced dispatch of prisoners to work on overseas infrastructure projects raises new issues regarding China's human-rights record.

Thousands of Chinese convicts, for example, have been pressed into service in projects by state-run Chinese companies in Sri Lanka, a strategically important country for China, which is seeking a role in the Indian Ocean. Such is Sri Lanka's vantage location that it sits astride vital sea lanes of communication. China — in return for being allowed to make strategic inroads — provided Sri Lanka offensive weapon systems that helped end its long civil war. Now, Beijing is being rewarded with port-building, railroad and other infrastructure projects.

Chinese convicts also have been taken to a microstate in the Indian Ocean, the Maldives, where the Chinese government is building 4,000 houses on several different islands as a government-to- government "gift" to win influence there. So far, however, Beijing has failed to persuade the Maldivian president to lease it one of the 700 uninhabited Maldivian islands for setting up a small base for its navy.

The Chinese practice in overseas projects, including in Africa, is to keep the number of local workers to the minimum and to bring in much of the workforce from China. The novel twist is that some batches of laborers now being brought in are made up of convicts "freed" on parole for project-related overseas work.

The convict laborers, like the rest of the Chinese workforce, are housed near the project site. The Chinese logic is that if any convict worker escaped, it would be easy to find the runaway in an alien setting.

Chinese firms actually bring in more than just convict laborers and other workers at overseas projects. To help boost Chinese exports, they get all equipment, steel, cement and other construction material from China.

Such practices run counter to the Chinese commerce ministry's August 2006 regulations — promulgated in response to the backlash against Chinese businesses in Zambia following the death of 51 Zambian workers in an explosion at a Chinese-owned copper mine — that called for "localization," including hiring local workers, respecting local customs and adhering to safety norms.

Chinese domestic regulations, however, are sometimes promulgated to blunt external criticism. They are thus seldom enforced, except when a case attracts international attention.

Despite the State Council's 2006 nine good-conduct directives to Chinese companies engaged in overseas operations, the government and corporate priority still is to aggressively boost exports, even if such a push engenders environmental and social costs for local communities abroad. Indeed, as part of the government's "going global" policy, Chinese companies are offered major incentives and rewards for bagging overseas contracts and boosting exports.

The use of convict laborers adds a disturbing new dimension to the "going global" strategy, which was first unveiled in 2001.

As it is, some Chinese projects, especially dam-building schemes, have been embroiled in several countries in disputes with local communities. The pressing of Chinese prisoners into service will create new rifts.

Chinese dam-building projects, for example, have been controversial with local communities in Botswana, Burma, Ghana, Pakistan and Sudan, among others. In Sudan, security forces killed three people and wounded several others in April 2006 to scatter demonstrators protesting the 9.2-km-long Merowe High Dam, while a similar protest against another Chinese dam-building project in that impoverished country, at Kajbar, left four people dead in June 2007.

Last April, several small bombs went off at the site of Burma's Myitsone Dam, whose construction by a Chinese company in the insurgency-torn, northernmost Kachin state is displacing thousands of subsistence farmers and fishermen by flooding a wide swath of land. Located at the confluence of the N'Mai and Mali rivers, the Myitsone Dam is China's project for China, with the local communities saddled with social and environmental costs as the scheme's entire generation of 3,200 megawatts of hydropower is earmarked for export.

Chinese companies also have been erecting dams in an internationally disputed area like the Pakistan-held part of Kashmir, drawing protests from India as well as from local communities that view the projects, including the mammoth 7,000-megawatt Bunji Dam, as potentially benefiting only the dominant Pakistani province of Punjab, located downstream.

China is not only the world leader in building dams at home, but also the top dam exporter. In fact, it has no qualms about building dams in contested territories, or in areas torn by ethnic separatism, or in other human rights-abusing countries.

China's declaratory policy of "noninterference in domestic affairs" serves as a virtual license to pursue projects that benefit governments known to repress their citizens. For example, in Sudan, where China has emerged as the principal backer of a regime accused of committing genocide in the arid western region of Darfur, 13 of the 15 largest foreign companies operating are Chinese, with Beijing making huge investments in the Sudanese economy — from hydropower to oil. It also has sold hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of weapons, including tanks and fighter-jets, to help prop up President Omar Hassan Ahmed Bashir, wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes in Darfur.

Chinese companies on their own cannot get prisoners released in the thousands, let alone secure passports and exit permits for them. It is obvious that the controversial practice of making use of convicts overseas has been initiated at the instance of the Chinese government.

Until Beijing's treatment of its own citizens and those of other countries is guided by respect for basic human rights and the rule of law, it is doubtful that China will command respect on the world stage.

Brahma Chellaney is the author of the international best-seller, "Asian Juggernaut" (HarperCollins, New York, 2010).

Backyard gardening on Manus

ROSELYN ELLISON

                                                                             

Nancy Niakakes Kusunan, from Pokali Island, Manus province, showing the fresh and juicy water melon she harvested from her backyard last Saturday morning.

It takes three minutes to travel to the main Mbuke Island by dinghy.-Nationalpic by ROSELYN ELLISON