Friday, July 17, 2009

Papua New Guinea minister in Samoa deals

Caption: Papaloloa House in Apia, Samoa, which Forest Minister Belden Namah reportedly bought for S$1.49 million (about K1.4 million), according to the Samoa Observer newspaper. Mr Namah says he merely facilitated an investment for his overseas business partners.

 

From The National, Papua New Guinea’s No. 1 daily newspaper

 

Namah denies top Apia properties are his

 

A SENIOR Papua New Guinea Government minister has been linked to the purchase of prime properties in the South Pacific nation of Samoa.

Forest Minister Belden Namah was named by the Samoa Observer newspaper in a front page report yesterday as the major buyer of prime properties, worth more than K4 million, in the capital, Apia – a claim he denied.

The Government of Prime Minister Sir Michael Somare is already embroiled in a similar controversy back home, with the Government gagging debate in Parliament last week about the circumstances surrounding Public Enterprises Minister Arthur Somare’s purchase of a K1.2 million property in the far north Queensland town of Trinity Beach, near Cairns, recently.

The Opposition said last night it would demand answers from Sir Michael on Mr Namah’s property dealings in Samoa.

Mr Namah’s lawyer yesterday threatened to sue the Samoa Observer over the report, saying: “He has merely facilitated an investment arrangement between one of his overseas business partners and his local Samoan partner.

“Mr Namah’s association with these property investments has been with and through his local partner and as the contact for his business partner abroad,” his lawyers, Tuala & Samau Lawyers, said in Apia.

The Samoa Observer reported yesterday: “Eyebrows were raised recently when it emerged a Papua New Guinea Cabinet Minister has started buying prime properties around Apia.

“This week it has been revealed Belden Namah, PNG’s Minister of Forests, has spent and committed a total of more than S$5 million buying local properties.

“He arrived in Samoa several months ago and started negotiations to purchase those properties.”

“Included in them is Chan Chui Co Ltd on Taufusi Road, one of Apia’s oldest companies. It was bought for ‘more than S$2 million’, confirmed Mr Namah’s lawyer in Apia, Siaki Tuala, on Wednesday.

“Mr Paul Chan Chui, who is understood to be the person to speak to on this purchase, could not be reached for a comment.

“But Chan Chui’s two-storey building has since been pulled down. It looks as if a new building will be built to replace it.

“The second purchase is of a two-storey home at Papaloloa which Mr Namah bought for S$1.49 million,” the Samoa Observer reported.

However, Tuala & Samau Lawyers said yesterday that none of the investment properties named in the newspaper story were registered or held in Mr Namah’s name.

“This is because he has merely facilitated an investment arrangement between one of his overseas business partners and his local Samoan partner, whom his business partners have met and trust.

“Mr Namah’s association with these property investments has been with and through his local partner and as the contact for his business partner abroad.

“They have viewed and negotiated for the properties together and hence the misconception that you have further fuelled that he is the buyer for all these properties.

“His role in all this is to facilitate the investment arrangements with his local partner and provide advice and feedback regarding the properties back to his overseas business partners.

“This investment in property is in no way illegal or unusual and is a positive benefit to our economy and for all those concerned,” Tuala & Samau Lawyers said.

Attempts by The National to contact Mr Namah for further comments yesterday were unsuccessful.

 

Papua New Guinea in the news, for all the wrong reasons

By SINCLAIRE SOLOMON in The National, Papua New Guinea’s No. 1 daily newspaper

 

PAPUA New Guinea made headline news this week in neighbouring South Pacific local media – but for all the wrong reasons.

Prime Minister Sir Michael Somare started the media controversy after returning from Vanuatu to announce PNG’s support for the military dictatorship in Fiji.

The Opposition reacted immediately, saying Sir Michael had sent the wrong message to people in the region in supporting an illegal regime which was destroying parliamentary democracy in Fiji.

Then the Government used its superior numbers in Parliament to gag debate and questions being raised by the Opposition over an Australian property purchase by Public Enterprises Minister Arthur Somare.

The house is located at Trinity Beach, Cairns. Mr Somare explained he had to sell a property in Boroko to buy the house, and was servicing both mortgages.

PNG’s relations with its neighbours took another nosedive when The Solomon Star newspaper in Honiara reported that outgoing high commissioner Parai Tamei had women problems – one died in a vehicle he was in and another had smashed a back glass window of the high commission vehicle.

The newspaper reported that although police investigated, no one was arrested or charged.

Yesterday, Foreign Affairs and Immigration Minister Sam Abal said “appropriation action” would be taken against Mr Tamei if he was found to have breached public service laws.

If that was not enough, Indonesian patience was tested with continued claims by Sandaun officials that a PNG youth who was shot dead by Indonesian soldiers near the northern border in June was a Papua New Guinea citizen.

Jakarta maintained, for the second time yesterday, that the youth, Isac Psakor, was a native of Bewan in Keerom district and was recovering from gunshot wounds in a Jakarta hospital.

And the latest adverse publicity on high-profile PNG figures came out of Apia, Samoa, with the Samoa Observer newspaper claiming that Forest Minister Belden Namah had gone on a property buying spree.

Mr Namah’s lawyers have denied that the properties are his.

 

Man killed after Origin 3 game

By PATRICK TALU in The National, Papua New Guinea’s No. 1 daily newspaper

 

A YOUNG man was killed on Wednesday night at Hohola Two in Port Moresby, right after the third State of Origin game.

The deceased, identified as Adrian Joe, 23, from Rarai village, Bereina in Central province, was allegedly killed by a group of Highlanders after a fight erupted between two ethnic groups.

Witnesses yesterday told The National that a commotion started near a tucker shop operated by a Highlander (named), where people had watched the State of Origin game.

On hearing the commotion, a reserve police officer, who lives there, tried to enquire what was going on.

However, he was allegedly assaulted by two drunk relatives of the shop owner.

The witnesses said some youths from the other ethnic group (named) tried to defend the police officer against the shop owner and his wantoks, who subsequently left.

However, it was alleged that a few minutes later, the shop owner retuned with his mob and retaliated, ransacking homes, chopping down trees and chasing people.

The 23-year-old man, who was among the onlookers, tried to run away to his house just 100m from the scene but was chased and slashed.

The severely wounded man was taken to the accident and emergency ward at Port Moresby General Hospital but was pronounced dead on arrival.

The National saw that the body had sustained multiple knife wounds.

Neighbours who viewed the body yesterday described the killing as “barbaric”.

The reasons for the fight were not clear.

Witnesses said the commotion began right after the game.

It was believed that drunken supporters of the losing Queensland team were involved.

Three weeks ago, four people died after watching the second State of Origin game.

They included Dei MP Puri Ruing’s son and a relative, with both university students aged 21.

Prime Minister Sir Michael Somare condemned a similar State of Origin-related killing.

Sir Michael said he was ashamed of the behaviour of the people when it came to State of Origin games.

Police yesterday apprehended a man and locked him up at the Boroko cell block.

The police forensic team is continuing with gathering evidence at the crime scene.

Attempts to get comments from NCD metropolitan commander Supt (Operations) Andy Bawa were unsuccessful.

Metropolitan commander Supt Fred Yakasa is believed to be out of town.

Japanese contribute USD 1.3 million to APEC climate change initiatives

Singapore, 17 July 2009 – With energy security and climate change emerging as two very real challenges to economic growth, Japan has contributed JPY 120,000,000 (approximately USD 1.3 million) to promote energy efficiency activities throughout the APEC region.

According to the Japanese Senior APEC Official, Makoto Shiotoa, “This sum is specifically directed toward the development and implementation of energy efficiency policies, goals and action plans in APEC economies.”

Such activities could include but would not be limited to: research of policies, practices and potential for energy efficiency improvement in APEC; vehicles for disseminating project outcomes; and the APEC Peer Review on Energy Efficiency, whereby efficiency policies are reviewed and compiled as a means of information-sharing.

“This fund is a very practical way to assist members to meet their commitments and maximise efficiency,” explains APEC Executive Director, Michael Tay. 

“The implementation of energy efficiency measures effectively pays for itself, through long-term reductions in energy costs.  Many APEC economies would therefore benefit by developing clear goals and action plans toward optimum energy efficiency.”

While the existing global crisis underlines the urgency of addressing climate change, initiatives are the result of commitments made by APEC Leaders in 2007.  The Sydney APEC Leaders’ Declaration on Climate Change, Energy Security and Clean Development states that “economic growth, energy security and climate change are fundamental and interlinked challenges” to the APEC region and emphasizes “the importance of improving energy efficiency by working towards achieving an APEC-wide regional aspirational goal of a reduction in energy intensity of at least 25 per cent by 2030 (with 2005 as the base year).”

To view the Sydney APEC Leaders’ Declaration on Climate Change, Energy Security and Clean Development in full, go to: 

http://203.127.220.67/etc/medialib/apec_media_library/downloads/news_uploads/2007aelm.Par.0001.File.tmp/07_aelm_ClimateChangeEnergySec.pdf

Japan’s contribution will be distributed through the APEC Support Fund, designated to enhance capacity-building activities.

For more information, contact:

Carolyn Williams at cdw@apec.org or at (65) 9617 7316

Anita Douglas at ad@apec.org or at (65) 9172 6427

 

 

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Statement by the NASFUND Board on the burning down of the Burns Philp site

Date: 15 July 2009

 

As you are aware the historic downtown precinct known as the Burns Philp site was guttered by fire last Sunday night. Firstly let me say how fortunate we were, that there was no loss of life. The fire that ripped through the 5,000 square metre site covering nearly a city block is perhaps the worst fire ever in Port Moresby’s history. Sadly we have lost an icon that was the country’s most historic colonial building. The Board has resolved to do what ever it can to ensure that we preserve the Bell Tower and advice to date suggests that it remains possible. The adjoining walls however cannot be saved and now present a hazard to safety. They must be pulled down and application will be made after review by a structural engineer to pull the tops of the walls inwards.

NASFUND as you are aware purchased the precinct two years ago with the express purpose of long term redevelopment that would encompass preservation of the Burns Philp Building. We have over the last two years worked to lift fire and safety measures within the buildings and preserve the original Burns Philp buildings - of which we were two weeks off final restoration.

 

Some pertinent observations.

 

During that two year period, the Board has faced difficulties from a number of quarters in renovating the building. We were aware of regulatory authorities seeking kick backs before approving renovations. NASFUND and its contractor, Hornibrooks NGI refuse to entertain bribery as a means to “getting things done” and this was partly the reason we were faced with an unnecessarily long process in getting full approvals.

Secondly we have had a long drawn out process in trying to break the inherited contract signed between the previous owners and Tribal Den. They have used the district courts to frustrate the process unnecessarily and bolster a case which is in our view untenable. The Tribal Den proprietors have continually frustrated the renovation works and through “carelessness” on a number of times damaged the renovations that were carried out.

Thirdly, Tribal Den operated in a manner foreign to proper business practice. It was well known that girls known as “hostesses” (some allegedly under legal age) were operating in the night club; drugs and breach of trading rules were also common knowledge. Tribal Den refused to live up to its obligations under the Superannuation Act. The manner in which they operated appeared to be one of always “testing the system” – typical of an approach that was at the core of issues relating to the riots of a few months back. Of interest was that two of the people with involvement in Tribal Den have at some stage been deported. Essentially, their mode of operation is not what we believe the community expects nor should it tolerate.

Fourthly, NCDC officials on a number of occasions have warned that the building was a health hazard. We urged relevant authorities to issue notices and for them to seek court orders removing the tenants. Always, they backed off legal action and the issue would disappear. NASFUND could not take legal action as we were prevented by a court order vis-à-vis the lease dispute.

Finally, as only far back as ten days ago, NASFUND worked with NCDC officials to close the Tribal Den Hotel on the basis of;

 

  1. Illegal internal constructions – Rooms and Ablutions (sanitary) areas not conforming to building standards
  2. 24hr water leaks from the ablutions area damaging walls and adjoining space
  3. Rotten timber
  4. Inadequate lighting
  5. Infestation of rats and vermin
  6. Non provision of appropriate fire exits
  7. Public nuisance including waste disposal and noise
  8. Poor ventilation
  9. Previous Hotel management obstruction of officials from entering the building – similar to that experienced by Hornibrooks and others in their dealings with Tribal Den.

 

NCD issued a notice of “Unfit for Human Habitation” on 7 July. Finally we had the tools to evict tribal Den without breaching the court order.

NASFUND and NCDC agreed to close the Hotel on Monday 13th July at 7.00 am. To this end we sought co operation from the police and a security guard firm was employed to assist. NASFUND had engaged Hornibrooks NGI to brick up the site and Port Moresby Locksmith to change all locks.

This would then allow NASFUND to clear the building of illegal constructions, bring the adjoining building up to building board standards and stop illicit activities occurring in the precinct.

NASFUND having made arrangements for the building to be closed on Monday now finds that 12 hours before, the buildings including the hotel is guttered by fire. The precinct has been cordoned off and is now under the authority of the Fire Department who has commenced forensic investigations. Insurance assessors are also sending an investigatory team from Australia.

 

Questions by Members Answered

 

Question:          Was the Buildings insured

Answer:            Yes

 

Question:          Will NASFUND take a loss irrespective of insurance?

Answer:            Yes, estimated up to K4 million against NASFUND’s half yearly profit is K78 million

 

Moving Forward

 

As we come to terms with this new reality, the Board casts its eyes on the future of the site. We now have to turn loss and destruction into an opportunity. The Board is mindful of its obligations not only to its members but also to the community as a stakeholder. It is also mindful that as the leading PNG owned property developer at present, there are limits to further development by NASFUND as a single entity because of asset allocation restraints.

The following broad understanding has been resolved by the Board.

 

  1. The destruction by fire of the sites now presents us with an opportunity to work in partnership in the renewal of Port Moresby Township in a way not seen before. It gives us both enormous scope and flexibility including open spaces and an arts application.
  2. NCDC will be invited to be part of this city renewal.
  3. If at all possible, the link to the past be preserved, meaning that the Bell Tower should be incorporated in any new developments.
  4. The scope of the redevelopment will not include high rise type constructions, but medium density buildings with potential for restaurants and walkways.
  5. The redevelopment will require joint venture partners suitable to NASFUND’s vision of a greater downtown Port Moresby.

Finally, NASFUND unreservedly apologizes for the inconvenience that has been caused by the byproduct of the fire including road closure and congestion. We will attempt to resolve these issues as quickly as possible. We also thank the Fire Brigade for their actions in ensuring protection of life and adjoining buildings and doing the best job possible under the circumstances.

 

For and on behalf of the NASFUND Board

 

John Jeffery

Chairman

 

 

Statement by Opposition Leader 15th July 2009 Carbon Trading and Office of Climate Change and Environment Sustainability

Mr Speaker

 

Our country has the world’s third largest rain forest.  We note and applaud the part Papua New Guinea is playing as a member of the Coalition for Rainforest Nations (CRN), a body set up to encourage the reduction of emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) and to convert forest assets into revenue without timber or other commercial exploitation.

At the same time, however, we note the paradox between these efforts and the very close connections between the Somare Government and timber companies, as well as the paradox between these efforts and our fiscal regime for forestry, and with logging practices throughout the country.  Paradox might, Mr Speaker, be seen to be a polite word for hypocrisy.

While the Opposition applauds the CRN initiative, we would like the PNG Government to give us more information about the CRN Secretariat – whether for example the PNG Government is contributing funds to the Secretariat, or whether any Secretariat staff are in any way connected to commercial transactions that the Government is entering for the sale of carbon credits from tracts of land in Papua New Guinea.

Of course climate change conferences are popular in 2009, but it would be hard for anyone (apart from perhaps our own Prime Minister) to match the globe-trotting of Kevin Conrad and Co – or indeed the theatrics they are performing.  Last week at Chatham House in London Mr Conrad attempted to defend what he called “irregularities” in PNG Government actions over REDD.

Mr Speaker, we note the alarming developments that have recently come to light in relation to premature carbon trading, and the most unusual agreements that the Government appears to be entering with a large number of individuals and companies to represent and trade carbon on our behalf, without proper scrutiny and without regulatory policy or legislation in place.

On behalf of the Opposition I wish to caution the Prime Minister and his Government and say that we trust that they will ensure that carbon revenue derived in respect of our country will be for the people, not for a few individuals or companies here or abroad.

I deliberately say “trust”, Mr Speaker, because if we are not careful, cowboys operating behind the scenes, using our name and wearing our cloak, will reap the lion’s share of carbon revenue.  Even Mr Conrad has admitted that, quote, “we had every carbon cowboy in the world descend upon Papua New Guinea and try to get a deal with landowners”.

Mr Speaker it appears that the Prime Minister and his henchmen, including the Minister for Planning and more recently the Director of the Office of Climate Change, have been hawking these potential assets around the world to all and sundry, including some of Mr Conrad’s “carbon cowboys”.

As far back as 2005, long before we had an Office of Climate Change, the PM and one of his kitchen circle were dabbling in carbon trading.   On 24th October 2005, Hon Paul Tiensten, then Minister for Trade and Industry wrote to a company called Climate Assist (PNG) Ltd.

Mr Speaker it absolutely amazes me that a minister of state could sign such a letter as this to anyone.  The lack of policy or process reflected in and by the letter is astounding. 

I quote: 

“The Prime Minister has accepted that PNG has carbon credits and they are trad[e]able commodity.  The Prime Minister and I have accepted that Climate Assist (PNG) Ltd acts as brokers on behalf of the Independent State of PNG to buy and sell carbon credits.

 

The carbon credits have been assigned to Climate Assist (PNG) Ltd through our certificate and monetization that will finance designated projects within PNG.

 

Therefore, this letter sets to acknowledge the role of Climate Assist (PNG) Ltd and advise that the Government of the Independent State of PNG unconditionally guarantee[s] all actions undertaken for the monetization of these credits.”

 

In the years since 2005 Climate Assist (PNG) has been actively pursuing the deal it struck with Mr Tiensten.  It seems that last year, 2008, the PNG Office of Climate Change signed memos with Climate Assist and another company called Earth Sky, whereby these companies would advance $10 million to the Office of Climate Change in return for the rights to sell $500 million carbon offsets, retaining 20% for themselves.  Mr Speaker, that 20% is worth $100 million.

A search of Climate Assist (PNG) Ltd with the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) reveals it to be a one dollar company based in Rockhampton with its sole director, Mr Gregory Corby, providing an address in Toowoomba.   We wonder what credentials this company has, Mr Speaker, to be appointed as broker for the state by the Prime Minister and Minister Tiensten.  We also wonder what connections it might have to associates of the Mirigini kitchen cabinet.

Recent media reports have revealed that another Australian company, Carbon Planet, last year advanced the Office of Climate Change $1.2 million.  This payment was reported by Carbon Planet in its 2008 financial statement to ASIC as quote “advance funding on [PNG] origination projects in the 2009 financial year”, that is, money which will be recouped from profits from PNG carbon trading.   

It is interesting to note that Carbon Planet says that it expects the voluntary carbon market to exceed $20 billion by 2012, just three years away.

As with Climate Assist, Mr Speaker, the Opposition wonders what connections Carbon Planet and its Chairman, Mr Jim Johnson have with the Prime Minister or the Prime Minister’s associates.

We also wonder why, when questioned about this payment by an AAP reporter, Mr Johnson would say so defensively (quote): “I am not explaining at all.  I am not having this conversation”.

We wonder what this payment was for, who this payment was made to, and what commitments either the Prime Minister or the Office of Climate Change has given to Carbon Planet in return for this money.

The three cases I have already cited Mr Speaker are not the only examples of premature carbon trading conducted by the Government.  Apparently last year, the Office of Climate Change authorized a Swiss based broker, South Pole Carbon Asset Management, to market 1 million tonnes of avoided carbon dioxide emission per annum from a PNG logging project based in the Sepik, April Salome.

A close relative of the Prime Minister is involved with yet another company, Pacific Carbon.  The media alleges the PM’s relative has been urging people in East Sepik to sign away rights to land for trading carbon to this company.

The Governor for Eastern Highlands brought more anomalies to light at the Regional Conference on Climate Change held in Goroka in May.  Hon Mal Kela Smith asked the Director of Climate Change why foreigners were controlling the millions of kina being poured into the Office.  He asked why the Office’s Advisory Board was demanding a percentage of income raised, rather than having a fixed budget like any other government agency.  He asked why a company based in the British Virgin Islands, Earth Sky, was being used as an agent, and who the real owners of the secretive Virgin Islands company were. 

Governor Smith drew attention to the checkered track record of Kevin Conrad in Papua New Guinea, and his close association with both the failed multi million kina POSF housing scheme (where K17 million disappeared, unaccounted for) and the demise of ANGCO, which resulted in PNGBC having to write off 35 million kina.  Understandably the Governor for Eastern Highlands was concerned about the financial probity of the Office of Climate Change.  Taking his lead, the Conference resolved to request the Public Accounts Committee to examine the Climate Change Office and the Auditor General to audit the books of the Office immediately.

To my knowledge neither action has yet taken place.

Not to be outdone by lesser known companies, Macquarie Bank seems to have also entered the arena.  Macquarie Bank has been in discussions with the Office of Climate Change, offering to broker carbon trade deals and retain 15% of profits.  If the voluntary carbon market turns out to be worth billions of dollars in the next couple of years, as predicted by a number of players, the Bank’s 15% would be very handsome income indeed.

And then we have the controversial Kumula Doso concession in Western Province.  Despite the ongoing court case over this concession between the Eco Forestry Forum on behalf of landowners and Rimbinan Hijau, it seems that Carbon Planet has hooked up with a company called Nupan PNG Ltd, to trade carbon credits in respect of this land - all sanctioned by the Office of Climate Change.  When asked why the Office had issued certificates authorizing such trade, the Director’s lame excuse was that the certificates – all 39 of them – were not real certificates, they were “samples”.

Mr Speaker, it is obvious that the whole situation in relation to carbon trading in our country is a complete and utter mess.  Instead of developing an appropriate policy and legal framework that ensures protection of the interests of landowners and the state, the Prime Minister, Ministers and the staff of the Office of Climate Change have been criss-crossing the globe, appointing “brokers” on who knows what terms, and basically selling people’s and national assets at whim.

Mr Speaker the Opposition wants to know whether Cabinet has approved all of these schemes.  We want to know what the purpose of these so-called advance payments is.  We want to know whether these monies were paid to Consolidated Revenue or directly to the Office of Climate Change or its agents.

If the funds have not been paid to Consolidated Revenue, we want to know how are they being accounted, and what authority the Office of Climate Change has to raise or to spend these funds.

Above all, we want to know why the Government is promoting all these deals, when there is no regulatory policy or legislation for carbon trading in Papua New Guinea.

Thank you Mr Speaker.

 

Rt Hon Mekere Morauta KCMG MP

 

Evidence of substantial efficiency gains seen in Papua New Guinea, according to analysts

Evidence of substantial efficiency gains seen in Papua New Guinea, according to analysts

 

 

Singapore, 15 July 2009 – Papua New Guinea has made important progress in implementing the Bogor Goals,” says a team of independent analysts.

This statement was made in an external review of the economy’s ability to reach APEC’s Bogor Goals, presented to officials today.  Having reduced tariffs, says the team, will contribute substantively to Papua New Guinea’s ability to reach its commitments by 2020.

According to the same report, Papua New Guinea has made notable efforts in promoting liberalisation and facilitation in the services sector – most notably in telecommunication, legal, tourism and energy services. Progress has also been made in standards and conformance and customs procedures.  The team also applauds efforts to improve regulatory transparency and to combat corruption.

The Bogor Goals are that free trade and investment in the APEC region should be established by 2010 in developed economies and by 2020 in developing economies.

Peer Reviews are conducted by independent, external review teams on a rotating basis and draw from the information found in economies’ most recent Individual Action Plans, reports issued by the World Trade Organisation and academic studies pertaining to the economy under review. 

A synopsis of the Peer Review may be found at:

http://www.apec.org/media/2009_iapbrief_pnewguinea.html

The complete report will be made available at the close of the APEC Senior Officials’ Meeting on 19 July at: http://www.apec.org/media/2009_iap_pnewguinea.html

Photographs may be found at:

http://www.apec.org/apec/news___media/news_photos.html

 

For more information, contact:

 

 

Carolyn Williams at cdw@apec.org or at (65) 9617 7316

Anita Douglas at ad@apec.org or at (65) 9172 6427