ANALYSIS: The state of
Pacific media freedom is fragile in the wake of serious setbacks, notably in
Fiji, with sustained pressure from a military backed regime, and in Vanuatu
where blatant intimidation has continued with near impunity.
Apart from
Fiji, which has a systemic and targeted regime of censorship, most other
countries are attempting to free themselves from stifling restrictions on the
press. But the Indonesian-ruled Melanesian territory of West Papua has emerged
this year as the Pacific’s worst place for media freedom violations.
Amid
a backdrop of renewed unrest and mass rallies demanding “Papua merdeka”, or
freedom for West Papua, with two bloody ambushes in Abepura on the outskirts of
the capital Jayapura in early August, security guards firing on strikers at the
giant Freeport McMoRan copper mine last week and the brutal crackdown against
the Third Papuan People's Congress this week,, repression has also hit the news
media and journalists.
In the past year, there have been two killings of
journalists, five abductions (including attempted), 18 assaults (including
repeated cases against some journalists), censorship by both the civil and
military authorities and two police arrests (but no charges).
Besides
criminal libel, Papuan journalists are forced to contend with the crime of makar
(subversion) as applied to the media.
“Also,” according
West Papua Media
editor Nick Chesterfield, “regular labelling of the Papuan press as being
pro-separatist is another significant threat against journalists seen to be
giving too much coverage to self-determination sentiment”.
Indonesia
became rulers of the previous Dutch colony of West Papua, which shares a
frontier with Papua New Guinea, through a flawed and manipulated referendum in
1969—the so-called “Act of Free Choice”.
Sluggish FOI
reforms
Coupled with governments that are sluggish to introduce
freedom of information legislation and ensure the region-wide constitutional
rights to free speech are protected, there are few Pacific media councils and
advocacy bodies with limited resources to effectively lobby their
governments.
Those that do, run the risk of inviting backlashes by
government figures who have a poor appreciation of the role of independent media
in national development. For smaller countries, media is still largely under
the thumb of governments and mainly an instrument for uncritically disseminating
official information.
Since the military coup in December 2006, Fiji has
faced arguably its worst sustained pressure on the media since the original two
Rabuka coups in 1987. The Bainimarama regime in June 2010 promulgated a Media
Industry Development Decree.
The new law enforced draconian curbs on
journalists and restrictive controls on foreign ownership of the
press.
This consolidated systematic state censorship of news
organisations that had been imposed in April 2009. The Public Emergency
Regulations have been rolled over on a monthly basis ever since. Promised
relaxation of state censorship after the imposition of the decree never
eventuated.
A controversial issue about the decree was a limit imposed on
foreign ownership of not more than 10 percent, a clause vindictively aimed at
the country’s oldest and most influential newspaper,
The Fiji Times
(founded in 1869) because of its unrelenting opposition to the
regime.
This newspaper company was then a subsidiary of News Ltd, the
Australian branch of Rupert Murdoch’s US-based News
Corporation.
Motibhai buy out
News Ltd sold the
newspaper to Fiji’s trading company, the Motibhai Group, and managing director
Mahendra "Mac" Motibhai Patel, a director on the
Times for more than
four decades, took control.
Patel said: “Fiji without the
Fiji
Times is unthinkable”. He hired an Australian former publisher, Dallas
Swinstead, to lead the newspaper in a more “accommodating” direction to
safeguard the survival of the business.
Ironically, Patel himself was
imprisoned for a year after being found guilty of corruption in April 2011 in
his role as chairman of Fiji Post—nothing to do with the newspaper. But the
impartiality of the judiciary since the 2006 coup has been under
question.
“During its history,” said a longstanding former editor,
Vijendra Kumar, “
The Fiji Times has changed hands at least five times
and has been none the worse for it. Each new owner infused it with new fresh
ideas and better resources to ensure its continued growth and
expansion”.
Fiji journalists themselves are divided about the impact of
the regime. Some have taken the view that faced with the reality of working
under a military regime, they would strive towards rebuilding the independence
and integrity of Fiji’s news media with the promised return to democracy in
2014.
According to Fiji Broadcasting Corporation news director Stanley
Simpson, who resigned this month: “In the main, journalists today are not as
confident (or as aggressive, as some would describe it) as their counterparts
were prior to 2006, and in the 1980s and 1990s.
“I am not saying that
current journalists lack courage—in fact it is a courageous thing to be a
journalist at this time.
'Checking
ourselves'
“However, given the PER [Public Emergency Regulations],
we are constantly checking ourselves and asking ourselves if the stories we
write will breach the PER and what the consequences may be.”
While the
region’s media freedom status may appear relatively benign compared to other
countries, such as in the South-east Asian democracies of Indonesia and the
Philippines, which enjoy a nominally free press but pose serious dangers to
journalists, there remain significant media freedom issues in most Pacific
Island countries.
Cultural issues involve the reconciliation of the
ideals and values of a burgeoning media with the entrenched practices of
compliance with traditional tribal or communal authority and for the most part,
small communities with many conflicts of interest.
Other issues include
problems of educating populations about dealing with the media, and a lack of
access to media experienced by many communities.
An ongoing feud exists
between the Suva-based Pacific Islands News Association and its breakaway former
members and detractors who would like the body that runs the regional Pacnews
agency to pull out of Fiji rather than risk being compromised by its proximity
and collaboration with the military regime that is so blatantly restricting
freedom of the press.
In its defence, PINA argues it can only convince
the regime to respect freedom of the press by working with it as it prepares to
draft the country’s new constitution in the lead up to elections.
Clashes
over media issues are not new, although they came to a head in Vanuatu last
November when crusading
Vanuatu Daily Post publisher Marc Neil-Jones
was strongly opposed by the Media Association Blong Vanuatu (MAV) when he
applied for a radio licence.
Intense media
climate
Vanuatu provides an example of an intense media climate
without any official censorship such as in Fiji.
Neil-Jones’s case in
March this year when he was assaulted by a group of men at the behest of a
government minister was another event in a saga of violent reactions to his
publication’s reports.
A minor fine for his political attacker prompted
further dismay from international media freedom and human rights advocacy
groups.
In East Timor, the vibrant local media scene continued to grow
this year with the launch of the island nation’s fourth daily newspaper,
The Independente. But a controversial new
documentary,
Breaking the News, highlights the dangers for
Timorese journalists.
Other countries and territories of the Pacific with
burgeoning media outlets experience development issues that restrict their
ability to bring news to both their citizens and diaspora who live abroad. The
Territorial Assembly of French Polynesia decided this year to drop the popular
online news agency
Tahitipresse and to scale back the national
broadcaster Tahiti Nui TV as part of a raft of public spending cuts brought on
by pressure from France.
Alex Perrottet is an Australian journalist
and contributing editor of the Pacific Media Centre’s Pacific Media Watch
project. Dr David Robie is director of the centre at New Zealand’s AUT
University and has lived and worked as a journalist in the Pacific for many
years. They compiled the Pacific media freedom report being published in Pacific
Journalism Review today.
Other contributors to the 39-page media
freedom report include:
Nick Chesterfield (West Papua Media)
Bob
Howarth (East Timor and Papua New Guinea)
Giff Johnson (Micronesia)
Nic
Maclellan (French Pacific)
Full text of the Pacific media freedom report
NZ media 'blindfolded' over West Papua crisis, say critics
Professor David
Robie
Director
Pacific Media Centre
Creative Industries
Research Institute
School of Communication Studies
AUT
University
Te Wananga Aronui o Tamaki Makau Rau
Private Bag
92006
Auckland 1142
Aotearoa/New Zealand
Tel: (64 9) 921 9999 extn
7834
Fax: (64 9) 921 9987www.pmc.aut.ac.nz