By Kevin W. Trueman
The most common perception of aid is that it is help
given to a person or persons in their time of need and given without the
recipient being obligated to pay for the assistance rendered. However, nowadays
in the Pacific on a government-to-government basis, you could be forgiven for
thinking that nothing is further from the truth. Canberra has now coined the
phrase “Aid for Trade”.
Australians and New Zealanders are generally
speaking generous people and they want to help Pacific Islanders without
looking for reward. This is aid done mainly through their charities and their
service clubs and organizations without the razzamatazz and self-glorifying
publicity of TV shows that seem to be the present style of government aid
agencies that are bent on promoting themselves.
So many of these so called AusAID projects seem to
employ large numbers of highly paid staff either on very high salaries or consultancy packages and the
majority produce little in return except
huge bills for the Australian taxpayer.
In the past, aid projects used to be run by whoever
was managing the project and there were no enormous administration overheads.
The managers had to be capable competent and persons
of integrity.
To be on the safe side, there was usually a six- monthly audit done by a
skilled auditor who might have a dozen or more such projects under his wing.
Accountability, profitability, transparency and honesty were not just expected
but demanded as the norm.
I remember when the former Labor Prime Minister,
Gough Whitlam came to power in Australia, and he proceeded to push Papua New
Guinea to earlier than expected independence. His explanation to the Australian
public was that this would save them a fortune in taxes and that the percentage
of profits from Bougainville Copper’s earnings that would be paid to Port
Moresby would more than compensate the Australian contribution of funding to
PNG.
In addition all of the senior Australian public
servants who worked in PNG would be given a “golden hand shake” once they
handed in their resignations. A lot of these people had more seniority than
many of the senior public servants in Canberra.
What has the result of this been? Maintaining the
old colonial administration would have been cheaper for the Australian taxpayer
than the present Australian aid programs with the highly paid advisers who pay
no tax themselves to Australia or elsewhere. In addition there has been a civil
war in Bougainville because the people of Bougainville resented their huge
mining revenues going to Port Moresby while they remained in relative squalor.
Whenever we get a Labor government in Australia, the
size of the public service sector increases, not usually by increasing the
actual number of public servants, but by engaging consultants, recruited
through consultancy agencies. This increases the cost to the Australian
taxpayer considerably. And makes some people in the know extremely wealthy.
A few days ago Australia’s Prime Minister announced
that Australia and New Zealand would
establish an education fund for Pacific Islanders of $40 million dollars for
tertiary education in New Zealand and
Australia
over the next ten years. If the average
cost of a degree is $50,000 per year and the average course is four years, it
will represent about 200 scholarships or the equivalent of ten scholarships a
year. What is embarrassing for Australians is that New Zealanders seem to be
paying the bigger share.
The twisting and bullying by the present Australian
Labor government on the Pacific Island Forum and the Pacific Islands generally,
is detrimental to Australia’s interest. The beneficences are China, Indonesia
and India, countries that are all making tremendous inroads into the region.
If Canberra had more dialogue with Australians who
were in business and had lived in the Pacific for some time, they would gain a
better and more comprehensive understanding of the region and its differences.
The Australian government needs to show more respect for the sovereignty of
their Pacific neighbours and get back to the genuine friendship that was there
once. The present bureaucratic arrogance shown by the government of Australia
to her Pacific neighbours only increases the influence of China, Indonesia and
India in the region at a geopolitical and economic cost to Australia.
Regional unity and a better and more prosperous
state for Australia and her Pacific neighbours will depend on enlightened aid
and cooperation by the governments in the region.
Kevin
Trueman has had considerable business interests in Australia, Papua New Guinea,
the Pacific and South East Asia, in trading, building, shipping, agricultural
and pastoral enterprises. He’s currently in business in Vanuatu and lives at
Port Vila.
No comments:
Post a Comment