Tuesday, October 12, 2010

NGE looking at six new wells despite shares fall

By PATRICK TALU

 

NEW Guinea Energy (NGE) says its shares price fell after the high impact Panakawa well failed to find oil, The National reports.

However, a revised deal with joint venture partner Talisman Energy means three to six exploration wells could be drilled next year.

In a statement, RBS Morgans Ltd analyst Nik Burns said at the current share price, NGE would make an inexpensive acquisition for someone looking to expand its position in PNG.

“We view the NGE shares price as over-sold and rate it as a speculative buy, target price to A$0.21,” Burns said.

The high impact well was drilled in third quarter this year, but failed to intersect oil.

On a positive note, the well did intersect a structure with a viable reservoir, and the well was drilled for under US$11 million.

But this did not protect the shares , which fell to as low as US$0.10.

NGE has renegotiated the terms of the Talisman deal to PPL 268 and 269.

At least three wells are now expected to be spudded by June 30 next year.

In addition to this, NGE is progressing plans to drill up to three additional wells in its other foreland blocks.

 “PNG is relatively under-explored and is highly prospective for oil and gas with attractive fiscal terms on offer,” Burns said.

There should be plenty of news flow on drilling activity and results, beginning next January, he said.

 

 

Government unveils plan

MTDP to cost K65 million in five years

 

PAPUA New Guinea’s development plans and programmes for the next five years will be driven by the medium-term development plan (MTDP), The National reports.

Cabinet yesterday approved the MTDP, which is part of the government’s 20-year strategic development plan.

It was estimated that the total cost for the first five years of MTDP (2011-15) would be K65 billion, which was essentially the annual budgets for the country for the next five years, starting with K8 billion next year.

Legislation to lock in the plan will be brought to parliament next month.

The decision by cabinet yesterday raised questions about the future of the government’s Vision 2050.

It is believed that the Vision Centre, which promotes the Vision 2050, will be abolished, but this could not be confirmed.

National Planning Minister Paul Tiensten yesterday confirmed cabinet’s approval of the MTDP.

 “This plan is more detailed. Budgets, starting with 2011, will reflect this plan.

“We have been having budgets that are open-ended. Not any more.

“There will be targets to be achieved and contracts will be performance-based. This way,

we will achieve our goals,” he added.

Tiensten said his department would monitor and implement Vision 2050, MTDP and SDP starting next year.

“The National Planning Department’s role will be purely monitoring and implementing, and nothing else.”

The minister said the MTDP would make the government, development partners, donors, departments and provinces accountable. It would also eliminate misapplication of policies.

The minister said he expected development partners like AusAID to “fit into the plan”.

With cabinet approval already given, Tiensten is expected to meet with PNG’s development partners in Port Moresby tomorrow to outline the plan, and what is expected of them.

“I expect them to streamline their programmes and support the government’s plan.

“Their funding of programmes, such as HIV/AIDS, will have to be realigned with our national health plan and the MTDP.”

He said the targets of the millennium development goals could be achieved at the 2015 target date, when the first MTDP cycle was completed, if the government and its partners pool their resources under this plan and work together.

 

 

Potape reinstated

PRIME Minister Sir Michael Somare has gone a full circle by appointing Komo-Margarima MP Francis Potape as the minister assisting the prime minister on climate change and LNG matters only weeks after stripping him of these functions, The National reports.

Documents furnished to The National seemed to suggest the prime minister had a change of heart last Friday to reinstate Potape the powers.

Two weeks ago, Sir Michael removed Potape’s ministerial powers days before leaving for the United Nations meeting in New York.

Potape had claimed that the documents for his removal were forged but the government printing office, which produced the gazettal documents, said the signature of the prime minister were authentic.

It seemed the prime minister did strip Potape of those powers, because he (Somare) had signed new instruments to reinstate him.

Copies of the instruments No: S1 245/2010 and National Gazette No: G239, dated Oct 11, 2010, obtained by The National, revealed that Potape’s responsibilities included the powers and matters related to:

* Liquefied natural gas and independent issues arising;

* Office and functions of climate change;

* Medium-term development goals;

* State protocols and ceremonies;

* Parliamentary services;

* Extractive industries including landowner development issues; and

* Other duties and powers as delegated from time to time by the prime minister.

The prime minister’s office and the media unit could not be reached for comments.

 

 

MP tells police to buy vehicles

By JEFFREY ELAPA

 

THE Police Department has been called to put a stop to using hire cars and unmarked vehicles to do police work, The National reports.

Member for Moresby Northeast Andrew Mald said this after several incidents involving armed criminals pretending to be policemen in police issue uniforms and firearm committed crimes in the city.

Mald said in several instances, organised crimes were committed using state-issued items while using unmarked vehicles and this was becoming a major concern to the public.

He said the state could not continue to waste taxpayers’ money for the police to continue to hire vehicles when they could simply buy new police vehicles which were also a pride for the force.

“If the department does not know how to buy vehicles and have all the necessary features of the constabulary, then give me the money and I will buy it for them like what I did for my electorate when I bought seven new police registered vehicles,” he said.

Mald said many policemen were also being implicated in organised crimes in the pretext of doing police work in unmarked vehicles as they are not distinguishable.

Monday, October 11, 2010

Principal plaintiff speaks out against Ramu Nico

By LOUIS MEDAING

I am the principal plaintiff in the legal proceedings that challenge the marine waste dumping plans by the Ramu Nickel mine in Madang. 
I instituted the legal proceedings on 24 September 2010 being WS1192 of 2010 to seek a permanent injunction to restrain Ramu Nico Management (MCC) Ltd from dumping five million tonnes of mine waste into Astrolabe bay annually, on behalf of myself and at this stage 38 members of the Tong and Ongeg clans from the Rai Coast.
A further 37 more clan members are seeking to join the proceedings this week.
Since the legal proceedings were filed in the National Court in Madang, my family and clan members have been put under intense pressure by the mine owners, Ramu Nico Management (MCC) Ltd to discontinue the court case.
The Tong and Ongeg clan members who make up the Plaintiffs and who are not employees of Ramu Nico Management (MCC) Ltd have been threatened that unless they withdraw or discontinue the proceedings, all Tong and Ongeg Clan members employed by Ramu Nico Management (MCC) Ltd will be sacked.
The Tong and Ongeg Clan members who make up the plaintiffs but who are also employees of Ramu Nico Management (MCC) Ltd have been individually told to sign documents which would withdraw them from the case, on threat of termination from employment.
Because of this intimidation, I have today filed an application in the National Court for punishment for contempt of court against Ramu Nico Management (MCC) Ltd and its employees Jacky Wang and Tonny Nongi as well as ward councillor Dongembu Dugai, particularly for assaulting , threatening and intimidating the members of the Tong and Ongeg Clans that make up the plaintiffs for the purpose of making the plaintiffs withdraw from or discontinue the proceedings.
I am informed by my lawyers that it is a serious offence to for a person or a company to take action to deter or obstruct a party from bringing or continuing legal proceedings as it is an interference with the administration of justice and constitutes Contempt of Court.

Louis Medaing
Plaintiff (on his behalf and on behalf of named members of the Tong and Ongeg Clans of the Rai Coast)

Managing potato late alight disease in Papua New Guinea

By DAVID MINEMBA and ANTHONY KERRU of NARI

The potato late blight disease is successfully controlled in this healthy sequoia potato patch in Tambul with the use of Echo, a Chlorothalonil-based fungicide.
The potato late blight (PLB) disease, caused by a fungus, Phytophthora infestans, is considered one of the most economically-important diseases of potato in the world.
It is a century old disease and was responsible for the great potato famine reported in Ireland in the 1840s.
This airborne fungal disease is reportedly present in almost all the countries where potato is cultivated.
Papua New Guinea was free from the PLB disease until January 2003.
It was first reported in the Surinki plateau, Enga province, and within few months it moved very quickly into the Western Highlands Province and eventually to other parts of the highlands.
By May 2003, it was found in all parts of the PNG mainland wehre potato crops are grown.
It must be accepted now that the PLB disease is here to stay, and effective, affordable and sustainable management methods are needed to control it.

Nature and effect of PLB in PNG
PLB is a poly-cyclic disease (it can complete a single life cycle within three to five days and can have as many completed life cycles in one potato cropping season, producing a large number of disease spores).
 The disease spores are easily transported by wind and can be carried over long distances in a short period of time.
This was evident in early 2003 where many potato gardens were completely destroyed within few months, causing the fall of the PNG potato industry which was estimated around K20 million - based on annual seed production figures.
One reason for this massive negative impact was that the industry entirely dependent on a single potato variety, sequoia, which is highly-susceptible to the PLB disease.

Research efforts in controlling PLB
The presence of the PLB disease in the highland has affected the livelihoods of many farming communities.
Many rural growers could not continue to cultivate potatoes.
Those that live in the high altitude regions (areas about 1800 – 2400 metres above sea level) suffered most as potato is considered their major source of food and cash income.
They were disadvantaged by lack of knowledge and unavailability of adequate resources to manage the disease.
Potato has then become a rich man’s crop; only those who can afford the costs associated with the use of chemical fungicides are able to grow potatoes.
Since the disease outbreak, NARI mobilised its resources with funding support from AusAID and the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research to develop a cost-effective and integrated disease management strategy for PLB for potato farmers in PNG.

Cost effective fungicide use
Use of chemical fungicides was the option immediately available to control the PLB disease in PNG after its outbreak in 2003.
Many farmers still had stocks of sequoia seeds and needed a control method against the blight.
 At that time, available chemical fungicides listed for use on PLB were tested on sequoia with the aim to develop a highly cost-effective fungicide application system. 
Cost-effective in the sense that it is profitable, user friendly and can be sustained over a long period of time.
The evaluations were specifically conducted to assess the optimal application rates of different fungicides and wetting agents, the effective spray frequencies, effectiveness of fungicides with curatives properties against those with systemic mode of actions and the effectiveness of integrating systemic and protective fungicides.
Results from these trials showed that the Chlorothalonil based fungicides such as Barrack®, Echo® and Banis® were highly effective in controlling the disease. Although this group of fungicides are more expensive compared to copper-based fungicides such as Copper Nordox® and Kocide® , higher gross margins are achieved, hence higher profits for potato growers.
The Chlorothalonils effectively controlled the disease when applied at three to seven days interval.
The copper-based fungicides also worked well when applied at three to seven days but needed thorough coverage on plant canopy to ensure that the potato plants are protected well from invasion of PLB.
This requires a lot of time, skills and efforts which proved difficult for many farmers when potato plants grow into larger canopies.
The project also assessed the fungicide Agri-Phos® which has a systemic mode of action.
This group of fungicides seemed to have worked well on potato varieties with increased levels of resistance against PLB with much longer spray intervals at 14 to21 days.
The findings from the fungicide trials presented the opportunity to integrate different fungicides in a manner that can substantially reduce the cost incurred by fungicides in potato production.  

Integrated disease management
The ultimate aim of the project on PLB management in PNG by NARI is to develop an integrated disease management (IDM) strategy.
 This IDM would involve the combination of different disease control methods such as cultural control, sanitation (e.g. removal and proper disposal of plant debris) and fungicide application but central to the IDM concept is a suitable potato variety with good level of resistance to the disease.
NARI therefore imported 56 potato clones, specifically bred for PLB resistance from the International Potato Centre in Peru, South America.
 These clones were evaluated under PNG’s growing condition and selections were made based on characters comparable to Sequoia which was used as a standard variety.
A NARI research trial  in Tambul showing rows of sequoia potato badly infected by PLB vs imported potato clones resistant to PLB.
The performance of the CIP clones were assessed based on set characteristics acceptable for potato markets available in PNG under field condition through to post-harvest.
To date, eight different potato clones have been selected for farmer evaluation.
On-farm trials have been established in 12 different locations in Western Highlands, Enga, Eastern Highlands and Morobe provinces.
 Once suitable potato clones are selected, an appropriate IDM strategy will be developed to control the PLB disease.
This should reduce the cost of potato production significantly and enable subsistence farmers to grow more potatoes again.     

Papua New Guinea unready for REDD

From PAUL OATES

Was someone 'Unready' for the UN REDD + talks?
Papua New Guinea media report that PM Somare has arrived back in the country and reported that the REDD + talks (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation) were successful.
Having redd, sorry read the reports coming from the REDD+ meeting in China one may well ask: "Successful for whom?'
A simple check on the Internet reveals an entirely different picture to that being portrayed by PM Somare.
Clearly the talks ended in a debacle with PNG being held responsible to the failure to agree on any real achievement.
 In fact, it is reported that the PNG co-chair was not actually a PNG national and had to take instructions over the telephone from a mysterious third party.
A quote from the following website says: http://recoftc.wordpress.com/2010/10/10/cancun-dead-ahead-for-redd/
"The Coalition for Rainforest Nations (associates of the PNG co-chair) contend that industrialised nations have used the stakeholder issue as a smokescreen to cover their unwillingness to meet financing commitments, according to this report from Ecosystem Marketplace. " But this is disingenuous.  Indonesia, Nepal and Viet Nam have all received multilateral funds.
" CfRN officials, on behalf of PNG, have actively stalled the initiation of the UN-REDD country programme.
" It appears that they are unhappy with the scrutiny that UN agencies would have over the funds."
So exactly how was this conference so successful for PNG?
Clearly the PM must be using a different definition of success to everyone else.

______________________________
__________________________


http://recoftc.wordpress.com/2010/10/07/dont-blame-png/

Don't Blame PNG!
Posted on October 7, 2010 by recoftc
The REDD+ partnership descended into a public farce on Tuesday evening
. I'm not letting any cats out of the bag by noting that the Papua New Guinea delegation is being pointedly blamed for derailing these important discussions, by the whole spectrum of participants here in Tianjin.
This is a tragedy for PNG.
Two years ago, the country and its negotiating team was still central to the rapid development of REDD as a concept and as a model of progress for the wider climate debate.
As well as initiating the Coalition for Rainforest Nations, PNG was a key early target of the UN-REDD and World Bank-funded FCPF, the main multilateral funding channels for REDD readiness.
The country had credibility as a serious player, even a leader, in the development of REDD.
That credibility is under serious threat.
It has been deteriorating rapidly with civil society, at home and abroad, for some time.
After the last few days, it must surely be severely damaged in the eyes of fellow delegates.
On Tuesday evening, the co-chair of the partnership, representing PNG, infuriated a roomful of delegates and civil society observers by single-handedly blocking - again - any discussions on stakeholder participation.
Against the express wishes of the vast majority of delegations, stakeholder participation was at the bottom of the agenda.
Two hours went by, agonisingly, as delegates, one after another, proposed discussing the topic immediately and the co-chair, with rapidly diminishing authority, continued to claim a lack of consensus to move forward.
 She proposed (and was denied) a closed meeting to discuss the matter, contrary to a clear decision at the weekend to keep all partnership meetings open to civil society.
Eventually, visibly distressed by the experience, she requested a five minute recess to confer with her Japanese co-chair, but instead made a half-hour phone call to a mysterious contact.
However, PNG must not be blamed for this.
 The co-chair herself is not from the country - apparently she has never set foot there.
This is but the latest in a trend of outsourcing of REDD matters to non-nationals, often at considerable expense and nearly always to the detriment of the interests of the people of PNG.
As Thomas Paka of Eco-Forestry Forum points out, how can such a strategy build the local skills and competencies required to run a sustainable national REDD programme?
Why are these resources spent on exorbitant consultancies instead of practical, domestic readiness activities?
PNG's civil society representatives continue to gain respect through their frank, constructive engagement at these talks.
There is clearly no shortage of home-grown talent which could enrich the delegation.
For the time being, they can only stand by and watch as PNG's  opportunity for international influence and investment diminishes.
Don't blame them.

Ben Vickers, 6 October 2010


http://recoftc.wordpress.com/2010/10/10/cancun-dead-ahead-for-redd/


Cancun Dead Ahead for REDD.

Posted on October 10, 2010 by recoftc

So we move on again.
 For the REDD+ partnership, the next stop was to be Nagoya, where the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) will meet for its 10th COP later this month.
 A ministerial meeting at this event, which would have made REDD+ a bridge between the CBD and UNFCCC processes, is off.
After several wasted meetings, on Friday the Japanese co-chair announced the cancellation of the Nagoya summit. 
There is nothing of practical significance for ministers to endorse.
 As the delegate from the Dominican Republic put it; 'I cannot ask my minister to fly 24 hours to announce the launch of a website'.
The painful, embarrassingly slow progress of the REDD+ partnership talks at Tianjin is the reason for this backtracking. 
The partnership meeting on Friday did approve a 'non-paper' on stakeholder participation devised by the co-chairs, but this has no formal weight.
The Coalition for Rainforest Nations (associates of the PNG co-chair) contend that industrialised nations have used the stakeholder issue as a smokescreen to cover their unwillingness to meet financing commitments, according to this report from Ecosystem Marketplace.  But this is disingenuous.  Indonesia, Nepal and Viet Nam have all received multilateral funds.  CfRN officials, on behalf of PNG, have actively stalled the initiation of the UN-REDD country programme.
 It appears that they are unhappy with the scrutiny that UN agencies would have over the funds.
What can we expect in Cancun? 
Well, the Mexican government expects this conference to be the 'REDD COP', where the main headline will be a binding UNFCCC decision on REDD+. 
This is, of course, not a formal position, as it would be an official lowering of expectations. 
But at least such an ambition is still achievable, and would represent considerable progress.
This week's talks have put a dent in such hopes. 
But some indigenous peoples' groups are encouraged by the travails of the REDD+ partnership.
They would like to see the UNFCCC itself regain control of the REDD agenda.
At a recent workshop in Xcaret, Mexico, with indigenous peoples groups and key REDD participating states, Mexico indicated that it would like to see social safeguards mainstreamed throughout the UNFCCC protocols, not just confined to REDD+ discussions, as it often is at present.
Bolivia would like the backing of global indigenous peoples' groups for their strident anti-market position on REDD+. 
But, despite the sympathy of many IPs with this position, formal support is unlikely. 
These groups value their independence above all, and will probably not formally tie themselves to any government body.
The launch of a Climate Fund, to allow developing countries to access finance for adaptation, is likely to be a key feature of the Cancun talks.
The Fund will probably be managed by the World Bank, but under the oversight of the COP itself, which will temper the opprobrium that many in the South naturally feel towards the Bank's track record.
RECOFTC will be in Cancun to follow these developments.
 In the meantime, keep expectations low and ambitions high. 
Catch up with us again in Mexico.

Ben Vickers, 9 October 2010


http://recoftc.org/site/fileadmin/docs/publications/The_Grey_Zone/2010/Media2_Decoding_REDD_.pdf


(in part only...)


Why should journalists cover forests and climate?

Tropical Asia is collectively a "biodiversity superpower," possessing vast natural capital crucial for the well-being of future generations.
About 3.7 million hectares of natural forests are destroyed every year in the Asia-Pacific,*risking the stability of ecosystems, communities, economies and the planet's fundamental capacity to support life.
Tropical forest destruction frequently involves conflict between people, often violent conflict.
Forests have a critical role to play in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and stabilising the climate. It is estimated that forest destruction results in global CO2 emissions equal to the transport sector, or about 17% of total emissions.
Ongoing international climate change negotiations have so far not produced the results that scientists and many policy makers argue are necessary to prevent catastrophic changes in the global climate. But efforts to reach agreement on the role of forests in addressing climate change are moving ahead much faster than other facets of the talks. This effort, known as "REDD+" is currently leading the way in UN climate deliberations.
REDD+ (which stands for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) is still a work in progress, and the future impact of REDD+ on conflict, environment, and poverty could be either positive or negative. What emerges will be one of the biggest stories of our time.
The 450 million people living in and around Asia-Pacific forests have a stake in the success of REDD+. The extent to which they have a voice and a say in REDD+ will determine its success.

and further on.....

Credits, cowboys, and other money matters
The matter of scale raises questions of how to get started with REDD+ (Where? Who? How much money?). Some early controversies suggest the obstacles ahead. These also make for great stories.
In general, of course, it pays to follow the money. A recent and disturbing story to consider comes from Liberia, where "carbon cowboys" allegedly bribed Liberian forest officials in a deal that could have bankrupted the entire country. A similar story emerged in Papua New Guinea in 2009.
Speculators and swindlers will naturally try to profit from the confusion of a new concept like REDD+. Journalists can help clarify matters and expose abuses.

and more yet ...

Who owns the forest?

In Brazil, the Juma project rewards communities with direct payments from local government for good forest stewardship.

In many Asia-Pacific countries, national authorities still claim ownership of the nation's forests, inhibiting a sense of local stake in forest protection.
REDD+ "refocuses us on the question, who do forests belong to?" said Joseph Zacune, a climate and energy coordinator at Friends of the Earth.
 "In the absence of secure land rights, indigenous peoples and other forest dependent communities have no guarantees that they'll benefit from REDD+.
There's increased likelihood of state and corporate control of their land, especially if the value of forests rises."
While REDD+ didn't create the problem of insecure rights, it affects ongoing efforts to address this issue.

______________________________
__-



Yet in today's on line The National, PM Somare reports the REDD + talks ended successfully and he is mobilising further funds for REDD + in PNG. Hmm.....


Voluntary carbon schemes risky, says prime minister


PRIME Minister Sir Michael Somare says the trading of forest carbon through voluntary carbon schemes in PNG is risky, premature and undermines an equitable REDD+ approach that is being promoted by the government.
REDD stands for "reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation", which is aimed at reducing greenhouse gases while delivering "co-benefits" such as biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviation.
The prime minister said in a statement that a domestic climate framework was not yet finalised to protect and safeguard the interests of landowners dealing with carbon trading issues in voluntary arrangements.
Rather, he encouraged forest owners to involve themselves in REDD+ demonstration projects with the guidelines being developed by the government through the Office of Climate Change and Development (OCCD).
He said this was because additional readiness efforts were required to allow for the sustainable and equitable participation of landowners under a global REDD+ framework.
"The voluntary trading of forest carbon is inadvisable at this time."
Sir Michael expressed concern that voluntary carbon trading schemes were thinly capitalised (around US$350 million per year globally) and were outside of the international REDD+ framework.
The REDD+ partnership, for which PNG is co-chair along with Japan, had received pledges of US$4.5 billion over the next two years under the Copenhagen Accord.
The REDD+ partnership meeting successfully concluded on Saturday at the margins of the UNFCCC climate conference in Tianjin, China, having reached agreement on stakeholder participation and agreeing to complete the 2011-12 work programme by December.
As a first step, PNG recently submitted its application to access the first US$6.4 million from the international UN-REDD programme to develop a new system to help landowners monitor and verify their forest resources, which would help PNG prepare for the implementation of REDD+ initiatives.
"Moreover, my government is holding ongoing discussions to mobilise further funds for REDD+ in PNG," the prime minister said
.