Monday, September 12, 2011

The census patrol before 1975

The Papua New Guinea government is undertaking a national census ahead of the election next year. Undertaking a census in PNG is a formidable task yet it used to be done annually across the nation by kiaps. PAUL OATES recounts his experiences as a kiap from the 1960s and 70s.

Children at Pindiu village assembled after a census.
I can only relate the census patrols I observed and carried out in the areas I was posted to.
The officer-in-charge of a patrol post or the Assistant District Commissioner would decide the time for the yearly census patrol.
If there was a local government council, the kiap might consult the councillors to determine when might be a good time, given the various demands on a villager’s time.
Out of the galvanised iron patrol boxes would come the loose-leaf, green-paged census books for the villages to be visited.
These books were held together with brass bolts and wing nuts and a sheaf of new pages would be taken with the patrol in case there had been any new additions or the families had changed or expanded.
For a large, extended village of say over 1,000 people, there might be two or more books.
However, most villages then comprised of around a few hundred people, as the fertility of the area’s soils often might not support large population numbers and the names were therefore contained in a single volume, about an inch thick.
The next step in the patrol preparation process would be to ‘send out the talk’ (salim toksave igo) about the upcoming census patrol.
This process might be by runner although in later years it could be over the local short wave radio station that operated out of the district capital.
By the early 1970s, many people had a battery-operated short wave radio receiver in the villages.
There were a number of reasons why it was important to let the local people know that a census patrol was coming.
Firstly, the people had to plan ahead for these events by coming together in their official village at the time the patrol arrived.
This wasn’t as simple as it first seemed.
Many mountain villagers did not actually live in the formal village and would often be living in small garden huts, next to their food gardens.
To ensure that everyone possible attended the census, village people might have to prepare well in advance.
This preparation might require the collection of enough food and firewood to last a few days.
Secondly, unless there was a fixed patrol line, it was important that there were enough suitable young people available in the village to be paid to carry the patrol’s gear on to the next village, after the census had been conducted.
When the patrol arrived, all the villagers would be assembled in an open area.
Custom dictated that men would sit on one side and women on the other.
A folding patrol table would be set up with folding patrol chair and the village census book produced and placed on the patrol table, in front of the kiap and a policeman would stand alongside the kiap with the official interpreter if required. 

About to commence a census: patrol table, flag and constable finishing his morning coffee.Census experiences before independence
Often the kiap would be sitting near the “haus kiap” (the kiap’s house) or government rest house in each village, where the Australian flag would be flying from a bamboo flag pole, indicating the government was in residence.
A call would then be sung (often “yodelled”), out by the village leaders in Tok Pisin: “Oli kamap nau. Oli sindaun, oli pasim maus” (roughly: come on everyone, come over here and sit down and be quiet).
When everyone had gathered together, the census book would be opened and the census commenced.
The names in the book were in alphabetical order starting with the husband’s name. The first name might begin with say “Bupe” and then came his father’s name “Zineroc” as areas in the Huon Peninsula were patrilineal.
Bupe Zineroc istap a?” (“Is Bupe Zineroc here?”) would be asked and the village leaders would sing out ‘Bupe, Bupe Zineroc, yu lain nau.”
Bupe would then stand up and walk up in front of the gathering and in front of the patrol table.
Alongside him would then stand his wife and all their children by descending height and therefore, age.
If he had more than one wife, the next wife would then stand after the last child of the first wife and her children then line up and so on.
It was the traditional custom in many villages that if a brother died, the brother next in line would take over the family.
In a Melanesian society, where no welfare or social security system existed, this custom made good, practical sense.
Most missionaries however, denigrated this custom and made every effort to stamp it out but without offering any practical alternative.
Under the year of the census, a tick would then be marked in the book that Bupe was observed in his village and that all his family was also observed and appeared to be in good health.
Any health problems would then be referred either to a medical assistant with the patrol or the villager would be directed to attend the patrol post health centre.
If Bupe was a farmer, as was likely, the abbreviation “s/f” would be noted after his name indicating “subsistence farmer”.
His wife would have “h/d” after her name indicating “home duties”.
If there had been a new addition to the family, the new addition’s name would be added to the book with a surname of Bupe, indicating who his father was.
The given name however might only be the child’s official name and might not be his or her actual name.
Children often might have their name changed as they progressed through their various ages and levels within their society and traditional ceremonies.
Sometimes, a name change might not actually be registered in the census book and then people could get confused about whose name was being called out.
However, with everyone from the village being there, any confusion was usually sorted out very quickly.
Other abbreviations that might be made against a name were: “absent male” and an indication where the person might be.
Illegitimate children could use their mother’s name as their last name or take the name of the male whose house they might reside in.

Why was the village census so important?

The village census records formed a basis for the registration of births, deaths and marriages as well as taxes and the electoral role.
It was also equally important for recording entries against an individual concerning health, education and law and order and any ongoing information the next patrol may need to investigate.
This was also the only legal, personal record available to rural Papua New Guineans.
The census patrol was very important as each villager had to be sighted and the overall health of the village to be noted.
This data formed the basis of an informed review of the area and a statistical analysis based on a record of any population growth or decline.
The details were then reported and assembled at each level of administration, from the base camp/patrol post to the sub district and then on to the district and finally to the whole of the territory.
This then allowed the administration of the country to be effectively based on annually updated statistical information.
During a census patrol in a village in the Aseki patrol post area, a family lined up in front of me. 
The young Paul Oates crossing a bridge on patrol
 Going through the family names, I called out the name of a young boy, who had been marked in the book by a previous officer as having been born over three years ago.
The mother quickly pointed with her chin to the baby in her bilum (the string bag hanging from her head).
Thinking that the child may have died and another given the same name, I said “nogat, em olsem dispela”, (“no, like this”), and marked with my hand, half way up my thigh above the knee, indicating the general height of a three-year-old.
 Again, after calling the child’s name the woman’s chin jerked in direction of the bilum on her back.
Mystified, I approached the woman who was standing next to her husband. The policeman standing next to me had already prompted a response from the sullen looking father with a terse “kaikai we?” (“where do you eat?”), indicating he should open his mouth and reply to a question asked of him.
Asking the woman to open her bilum I peered into it and was horrified to see a curled up, crinkled, emaciated form of what was apparently a three-year-old child.
 I glared daggers at the father who cringed away and explained, via the village Tultul (interpreter) “mama inogat susu na emi no save kamap gut” (“his mother’s milk dried up and he didn’t grow up very well”).
I turned to the Luluai (village leader) and instructed him in no uncertain terms to take the mother and child immediately to the Aseki health centre for treatment.
When I arrived back at the station at the end of the patrol, I checked and the mother and child had already been flown to the district capital Lae and were now at the Angau base hospital.
The child, who was severely malnourished and dehydrated, was eventually saved and I heard later, survived to grow up.
Later that night around the camp fire, I confided to my police Constable in Tok Pisin.
“When I saw the child’s condition I was so angry, I damn near hit the father!”
He replied in the same language: “You’d have had to stand in line, sir.”

Tracking for tragedy – poor governance poses risks for Papua New Guinea


By KEITH JACKSON


Keith Jackson...bad governance a risk for PNG
Earlier this year Laura Bailey, the World Bank’s country manager for Papua New Guinea, nailed it.
At a Port Moresby workshop organised by the Institute of National Affairs she stated forthrightly that corruption and bad governance in PNG are feeding off the mining sector.
Of course it’s not only PNG’s abundance of exploitable resources which is responsible for the country’s governance woes – sheer incompetence makes a noteworthy contribution, as it does at present in Australian national politics.
But the enormous scale of PNG’s future wealth has the capacity to make a big difference: properly managed, it will provide an opportunity to create a prosperous nation; poorly managed, it will greatly enrich a few people and send the bulk of the population to hell in a handcart.
The pivotal point is governance, pithily defined by the World Bank as “the exercise of political authority and the use of institutional resources to manage society's problems and affairs”.
The burning question is how PNG’s national governance will deal with corruption’s deliberate intent to advantage the few at the expense of the many with resources that are the rightful property of the people.
Let’s not mince words, in simple terms poor governance manifested through corruption is complicity in theft.
“Because of corruption, we cannot expect the police to protect us, nor the courts to punish the criminals,” a frustrated Dr Thomas Webster, Director of the National Research Institute, said a few months back.
“If you or any of your family members are sick … you may find that the drugs needed to cure the illness (are) not available because of corruption.  
“This cancer is now threatening the very essence of good governance and how we make decisions at the highest levels.
“The administrative framework for good governance in managing and using resources for the benefit of all Papua New Guineans are not being adhered to.” 
Succinctly and accurately phrased.
The Australian government’s response to this situation – given that it provides PNG with upwards of half a billion dollars a year in development funds – is bland.
The official position is that “the basic responsibility for improving governance and addressing corruption in PNG resides with the government of PNG,” as parliamentary secretary Richard Marles has put it in an article for PNG Attitude.
“That said,” he added, “Australia is strongly committed to supporting our closest neighbour to address these challenges.”
In other words, it’s none of our business but we’ll deal with it under the covers.
 Sure, no nation likes megaphone diplomacy but when it comes to serious moral issues like poor governance and corruption, surely at least a Chimbu yodel would be in order.
In fact, more assertive Australian support might encourage leaders like new Prime Minister Peter O’Neill to take a more forthright stand for good governance and to start rooting out corruption.
While O’Neill has a reputation as being a clever deal maker and a hard-headed businessman, he now needs to step up to the plate and apply that inside knowledge and those undoubted creative skills in the broader interests of the people of Papua New Guinea.
Together with colleagues like former prime minister Sir Mekere Morauta and younger leaders like Belden Namah, Sam Basil and Powes Parkop, all of whom have a keen understanding and a clear commitment to good governance, O’Neill has a golden opportunity to guide PNG in the right direction – where the nation’s wealth will be applied to the benefit of all its people.
To achieve this, he will need to apply every grain of his reputed toughness and, in the words of Paul Barker, Director of the Institute of National Affairs, “(take) governance issues … much more seriously than now”.
Elder statesman Sir Mekere Morauta has long been a stout proponent and, in office, an effective practitioner of good governance.
 Earlier this year, he told a seminar on corruption at Divine Word University: “A culture of corruption is now entrenched, and has permeated nearly all aspects of the public sector and, to some degree, business.
“Corruption and patronage have become institutionalised.
“They have even been legalised.
“Every day we hear about corruption.
“Every day we talk about it.
“Every day we see and hear of leaders and businesses getting away with it.
“We could fill a whole prison with people recommended for prosecution in the various Commissions of Inquiry over the last 20 years, but which of those people has actually been prosecuted, let alone gone to jail?
“A few politicians have been thrown out of office for breaches of the Leadership Code, but that’s basically it.”
Morauta offered a long list of sins against the people of PNG: “Commissions and bribes, whether millions on government road contracts or a hundred kina to sell your stationery to a purchasing officer in a government department” … “politicians, public servants, board members or company executives failing to declare their personal interests in contracts or deals being decided on or in appointments being made” ... “interference in decision-making, in neglect of due process and lack of prosecution for breaches of the law” … “running to the courts to prevent institutions like the Ombudsman Commission from carrying out its constitutional role” …
No nation can operate with stability and fairness – and success - if it does not take urgent steps to stamp out this kind of misbehaviour.
To the perpetrators, corruption might seem victimless (“it’s only money”), rationalised by self-justificatory thinking (“I’m really owed this anyway”) and excused by generalisation (“everyone’s doing it”).
In PNG today not only are there are not enough voices railing against poor governance, there are not enough important voices, the voices are not loud enough and they are not being reinforced by concrete and, where required, draconian action.
As for Australia’s conduct of its development assistance programme, especially the ‘boomerang aid’ that ends up back in Australia and the rapacious fees paid to consultants and contractors, surely there is someone in Canberra who understands that this is contributing to a climate in which at least some PNG politicians and senior bureaucrats feel justified in behaving as avariciously as they do.
The perpetuation of poor governance in PNG, and public tolerance of it by Australia, may appear to be a soft option but it seems set to yield some pretty awful outcomes.
I believe both countries are on notice.

Keith Jackson AM is publisher and editor of the PNG Attitude website and magazine, and chairman of leading Australian public relations company, Jackson Wells Pty Ltd

WikiLeaks: When the past comes back to haunt Papua New Guinea

The ‘Moti Affair’ isn’t over for Papua New Guinea,  warns SUSAN MERRELL

Legend has it that Italian courtier Damocles was awarded a much-coveted throne that brought with it great power and wealth.  But also inherent in the acquisition was a sword, suspended by a single horse's hair over the throne - the proverbial 'Sword of Damocles'.

Considering the threat intolerable, Damocles relinquished the throne(although I've never quite understood why he didn't just remove the sword).
There are outstanding issues,precariously suspended,like the Sword of Damocles, over the Papua New Guinea government.
The Moti Affair, for instance –while a legacy of the Grand Chief, Sir Michael Somare, unresolved, it's now been passed on to the new PNG government and, in its current state, will dog any subsequent government.
Recent Wikileaks cables emanating from the US embassy in PNG are a reminder.
In one cable, headed 'Papua New Guinea Prime Minister on Moti and Bilateral,'Somare stated that the PNG government "knows who the culprits are [in the Moti affair]."
He criticised the Australian Federal Police for bypassing the office of the Foreign Minister and of the Prime Minister by going directly to the PNG police who co-operated with the Australians in an arrest that was without a warrant and with extradition papers that were "not properly authenticated."
"I can't put up with this type of nonsense, "said Somare. " If I'm wrong on questions of law, I admit it.  I was not wrong."
At the time, the then and current attorney-general Dr Allan Marat, and Morobe Governor Luther Wenge, a former acting Judge, went further adding that PNG should take Australia to task in the International Court of Justice.
Two subsequent governmental inquiries, the Defence Inquiry and the Ombudsman's Report drew similar conclusions on the matter of Moti's arrest. 
However, the Reports also found that Somare had a case to answer in the matter of Moti's clandestine Defence Force flight out of PNG. These findings have threatened Somare's tenure as Prime Minister since the reports were finalised.
Influential commentators such as Professor John Nonggorr, a leading constitutional lawyer, suggested that Somare should have stepped aside over the affair: like Damocles he should have relinquished the throne.
Conversely, Somare chose to negate the effects of the reports by challenging their legitimacy.  He was successful. The Ombudsman's report was rejected in Parliament and the Defence Inquiry was discredited factually and legally.
Somare metaphorically succeeded in putting extra distance between himself and the sword butit's still there and it won't go away while the matter is not appropriately addressed. It's an ominous and unwelcomepresence for whoever takes up the mantle of government.
For notwithstanding who was to blame for Moti's illegal arrest, the buck stops at the PNG executive.  As a sovereign nation, PNG bears direct responsibility for the conduct of its agencies, regardless of whose interests they were serving at the time.
This could be an expensive lesson.
For, in March of 2010, The Sunday Chronicle reported that Moti's PNG lawyer was seeking an invitation to present a quantum of damages for settlement to the solicitor general.  Compensation – the justice system that oils the wheels of Melanesian society.
Peter Pena Lawyers, cite breaches of International law, Common law and PNG law including defamation, false imprisonment, conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and other charges suggestive of human rights abuses.
To date, no compensation claim has been lodged.
The question of redress for Julian Moti is a vexed one. The Moti Affair has gone on for so long and has been before so many courts and Inquiries in PNG that one wonders how impartial PNGs judiciary can be should Moti decide to sue the state?
After all, it was Justice Kofi in the district court that first refused to entertain the facts put to him by Moti's lawyers (later deemed to be correct by the Ombudsman's report) that Moti was wrongfully before that court.(Ironically, Chronox Manek, the Chief Ombudsman responsible for the Report was the enthusiastic Public Prosecutor at the time of Moti's arrest)
Later, Justice Cathy Davani needed an extra two weeks to 'acquaint herself with the facts" on Moti's case – during that time Moti was flown out to the Solomon Islands, when PNG could no longer guarantee his safety. How much bearing on the decision to fly Moti out was precipitated by the lengthy court delay?
Subsequently, Deputy Chief Justice Salika, headed up the discredited Defence Inquiry Report with the now Justice John Kawi as his leading counsel.
In fact, so many members of PNGs judiciary have actively taken a part and/or expressed opinion on issues of the Moti Affair(such as Justice Sakora who coined the phrase 'Motigate') that to suspect prejudice is reasonable.
The PNG government should take the lead - relieve the PNG courts of this responsibility, use executive powers to divest itself of this negative legacy – remove the Sword of Damocles before it does more damage.

Somare told to respect suspension

THE Ombudsman Commission says suspended member for Angoram Arthur Somare should refrain from signing provincial executive documents, The National reports.
Chief Ombudsman Commissioner Chronox Manek was responding to a newspaper article in which Somare blamed the commission of "complicity" over the latest political events including the dismissal of Grand Chief Sir Michael Somare from parliament.
Somare said the OC had been complicit in the Speaker's decision to declare the East Sepik regional seat vacant by not using its discretional powers to invoke the recall of parliament.
But Manek said Somare had been informed of his involvement in the PEC decision and signing the documents as a leader after he was referred to the Leadership Tribunal on July 4.
He said although Somare had questioned the validity of his referral, his suspension under section 28 of the Organic Law on the duties and Responsibilities of Leadership had not been lifted.
He said the section stated that where a matter had been referred to a tribunal under section 27, the person alleged to have committed misconduct in office was suspended from duty with full pay.
He said when allegations of misconduct had been referred to a leadership tribunal, a leader was suspended from duty, and therefore denied any opportunity to engage in any official duties
.

Watchdog rejects East Sepik government request

By JEFFREY ELAPA

THE PNG Ombudsman Commission is unable to exercise its discretion to invoke powers under section 27(4) of the Constitution and therefore has turned down a request by the East Sepik provincial executives to stop the recall of parliament, The National reports.
Chief Ombudsman Chronox Manek was responding to a newspaper article which quoted Arthur Somare, the suspended MP Angoram, as saying the commission should use its discretionary powers to stop parliament from being recalled.
He blamed the OC of "complicity" over the latest political events including the dismissal of Grand Chief, Sir Michael Somare from parliament last Tuesday.
Manek said he received three letters from the East Sepik provincial executive which were signed by Governor Peter Wararu, deputy Toby Samek and Arthur Somare representing the East Sepik provincial executive council.
They also went to the commission on  Aug 30 and Sept 2.
He said the letter had requested the OC to invoke its powers under the Constitution and prevent the recall of parliament pending the resolution of the Supreme Court proceedings, prevent parliament from embarking on course of actions including the recall of parliament in breach of the Organic Law from Sept 6 to 20.
Manek said the Ombudsman Commission responded on Sept 5 declining the request.
It was based on the fact that the reference by the East Sepik provincial executive was before the Supreme Court and as such there was a risk of prejudice to the administration of justice if the commission invoked its powers and prevent the recall of parliament.
The OC is also a party in the court proceeding.
He said the OC had also advised the three that they could use the court to stop the parliament sitting.
Manek said the parties were informed that the issue of directions would not be in the best interest of the current proceedings and the OC could be seen as interfering with the constitutional process of parliament which was determined by the constitution and the organic law on meetings of parliament.
"The commission's powers to issue directions under section 27(4) of the Constitution is self-executing and can be used independently as a particular case or circumstance if a case permits," he said.
However, the intention of section 27 (4) of the Constitution is to attain the object of subsection (1), (2) and (3) of section 27 of the constitution which provide generally for the preservation of the integrity of the persons subject to the leadership code.
Therefore, he cannot interfere with the constitutional process and the organic law on the calling of meetings of parliament and therefore the commission can not exercise it discretionary powers.

Marat moots alcohol ban

By ABIGAIL APINA

ATTORNEY-General and Mi­nister for Justice Dr Allan Marat says the only way to curb alcohol abuse is to ban it, The National reports.
 "Why don't we just ban alcohol so that the issue of alcohol abuse can be eradicated?" he said while addressing the New Guinea Islands alcohol abuse symposium at Gazelle International in Kokopo.
He said it saddened him to see many young people with long productive lives indulging in alcoholic binges.
"Is alcohol the mainstay of our economy? Will our economy collapse or go into recession without alcohol?" Marat said.
Marat said Papua New Guinea had  never been serious about dealing with the wrong use of alcohol.
"We come up with grand plans and visions but we allow alcohol abuse to destroy these plans and vision," he said.
He said while alcohol might be good for health reasons, it had been used in "prohibited ways", leading to harm and destruction.
"We never seem to learn, we are undecided, we are kidding ourselves, we are hypocrites," Marat said.
He said many people preached against alcohol abuse but they continued to contribute to the pro­blem in many ways.
He said the abuse of alcohol had affected family units, communities, the labour force, production and quality of products.
He said it had affected the performance of the economy at both micro and macro levels in a negative way.
"Many of us are sick and tired of talking about alcohol abuse because authorities are not listening," Marat said.
He said in order for PNG to develop a safe, healthy, wealthy and smart society by 2050, the issue of alcohol abuse should be addressed.
"If there is a reason for the indulgence, treat or correct the reason or consider banning alcohol so that we don't have to worry about ramifications of abuse," he said.

Sunday, September 11, 2011

Speech by Prime Minister Peter O'Neill at a Brisbane business luncheon, Friday, September 9, 2011

Thank you, Sir Rabbie Namaliu, Frank Kramer and your team from Kramer Ausenco and Norton Rose for organising this business luncheon.

I am honoured to have been asked to address this gathering of very important investment friends and development partners of Papua New Guinea today.

I see among you the who's who of PNG's mining and petroleum investment sector and I am proud.

It gives me an added pleasure, on this occasion, to be able to talk to you as the new executive head of a new government PNG's elected leaders created over a month ago. In fact, today marks the 38th day of the new government's existence in office.

I know you are all eager to hear what I have to say about my government's attitude to foreign investment in PNG under my watch over the next few months and beyond.

I know you have questions to ask in light of some early ministerial pronouncements with respect to equity participation and ownership issues in PNG's mining and hydrocarbon sectors in particular.

Let me say that I am here to put your questions and your curiosity to rest so that we can all move ahead to higher levels of understanding, progress and achievement hand in hand.

 

CHANGE OF GOVERNMENT

 

First of all though, it is only fair that I make a brief mention of the change of government and leadership in Papua New Guinea on August 02.

We changed the Somare-led government because it needed to be changed. That government lost focus on assertive and decisive political and government leadership.

 Worse, it lost focus on the nation's budgeted national development and public investment programmes.

For seven months, since the beginning of the year, but more so in the five months, that my predecessor had left the leadership of the nation to an Acting Prime Minister, uncertainty reigned.   Chaos was not too far away.

Political instability crept in. Corruption and misappropriation of hundreds of millions of Kina for budgeted national development and public investment programmes became the order of the day.

Our situation was not helped when a small group of Ministers closely linked to Sir Michael Somare and the National Alliance Party became reckless and did as they pleased in the Grand Chief's prolonged absence on account of his illness.

The government of Papua New Guinea had effectively been "hijacked" by this small group of  Ministers, who used and abused the serious illness of the then Prime Minister to subvert the parliamentary and cabinet processes and abuse public funds and property.

Public money became ring-fenced by these Ministers and used or abused as they pleased for programmes outside of those approved under this year's national budget.

Unstable political and government leadership mixed with reckless management of the nation's public finances was recipe for irreparable national dysfunction of major proportions.

In a nutshell, the former government led by Grand Chief Sir Michael Somare and his  hand-picked former Acting Prime Minister Sam Abal had to be changed to save our nation from becoming  the "Dysfunctional Blob" that our friends from this side of the Coral Sea love to describe us.

My friends, 70 Members from both sides of the political divide in Papua New Guinea's 109-Member Parliament could not have been wrong when they overwhelmingly voted to "correct a correctable" political and government leadership impasse in our country.

That impasse was undoubtedly starting to harm our national integrity, development and services delivery and importantly, investor confidence.

 Under our system of government, Prime Ministers are chosen and removed by the National Parliament. The Head of State has no role, no reserve powers.

 We used the inherent lawmaking authority of our Legislature as one of three arms of government within a democratic framework to underpin the parliamentary change of government.

The process is being tested in the courts. We uphold the rule of law and we respect our legal, and our constitutional processes. It is a pity the former government did not do so. Had it done so the events I have outlined would not have been necessary.

Let me summarise the position. I lead a properly constituted government; it has a strong and coherent parliamentary majority. And its blends experience, competence, and integrity, with youth and enthusiasm.

It is probably the most experienced and qualified, and broadly based and representative, government in our history as a nation.

Early indications are that most Papua New Guineans are happy with the change of leadership and government.

We have moved swiftly to complete a number of unfinished legislative businesses of Parliament and are functioning assertively and decisively to cleanse the system of corrupt elements.

My government has already established an investigative team to probe various financial abuses including the disappearance of millions Kina of PNG's development budget for 2011 in the first quarter of this year.

 

 CHALLENGES AND MOVING FORWARD

 

Let me move on to some of the challenges - and opportunities - we face as a government.

 One of my first challenges as Prime Minister is to address corruption and the abuse of public money.

In the short term we have appointed an investigator to quickly examine suspicious financial transactions that occurred outside the proper processes during the final months of the last government.

But in the medium term we will do what should have been done years ago - establish a well-resourced Independent Commission against Corruption. That was one of the first commitments of my new government.

 The best way to wage war against corruption is to significantly increase the prospects of detection, and successful prosecution. That is what the new commission will be charged with doing.

The current system is simply not working. It has not been working for years.

My government faces enormous challenges in improving basic service delivery, and in rebuilding and expanding vital national infrastructure - such as roads ports and electricity.

This is the infrastructure you and other investors need to effectively develop our vast

mineral, oil and gas resources in particular.

Money is not really the problem. The capacity to spend it effectively is.

We have serious public sector capacity and delivering problems. Devolving delivery to local communities, and using the resources of our churches and NGO's , is helping to improve service delivery.

But there is a long way to go. Time is not on our side. The national elections are less than a year away, but we will use every day between now and then to try and address some of these great challenges.

 

INVESTOR CONFIDENCE

 

Let me now turn to the issues you all want to hear about today. Papua New Guinea needs foreign investment dollars.

I say this without a shadow of doubt and with all sincerity.  I am realistic enough to also say that wanting foreign investment and expecting it on a golden platter is not a one way street.  Yes, it's a two-way street. We give to you as well as you give us.

In the first few days of coming into office, a number of statements pertaining to the various equity and ownership positions were made by a number of my ministers.

Let me reassure you that the goal-posts have not been shifted and relocated.

The playing field remains the same and shall be maintained that way for the foreseeable future.

In the mining industry, the applicable law provides for 30% equity for PNG to take up in any new mining project.

Similarly, the equity position provided by the PNG Oil and Gas Act provides a 22.5% equity stake for PNG.

 The PNG government, affected provincial governments and landowner communities share these equity and other benefits provided under the respective applicable laws.  

If local interests demand higher equity position for landowners and provincial governments, the onus is on the National Government to resolve such demand from our equity position as stipulated by the Mining and Oil and Gas Acts respectively.

We can also make adjustments under the applicable tax regimes to reward provinces that host these multi-billion dollar mining and petroleum projects with some percentage of tax benefits derived from these projects.

The most-important agenda of my government, with respect to the mining and petroleum industries, is to create an enabling environment within which projects can be developed peacefully  and benefits and multiplier business opportunities derived thereof are shared fairly among all stakeholders.

There is no need at the present time to destabilise mining and petroleum industry developers and investors with a law designed to compromise or reduce their present respective equity position.

The applicable laws have not changed. Changes may and will occur in the future but they will have to be driven by a win-win formula for all stakeholders in a predicable manner.  

These changes – when they are desired and when they do occur - will take place with and after comprehensive dialogue and discussion with you and with all other affected parties including landowners in Papua New Guinea.

Let me also reassure you that my government is about being inclusive right across the board on all matters of national affairs.

And that includes all aspects of the foreign investment and natural resource extraction industries sectors in PNG.

My government is not about creating sovereign risks for my nation's foreign investment and development potential.

My government is not about making life difficult for foreign investors, especially those that have invested millions of dollars in speculative exploration and later to develop and underpin emerging world class mining and hydrocarbon industries in PNG.

My government respects the principle of finders keep and finders share. That is the spirit within which we will, and we shall all operate under my watch.

 I have cautioned, and will caution again, my ministers and State-owned corporations, involved in the mining and hydrocarbon industry, to desist promptly from giving misleading signals to the foreign investment sector.

It is not my government's position to create insecurity, political risk or threaten foreign investment with expropriation. Some of these negative signals have been made since my government took office.  

I will vigorously investigate this deception targeted at the progress of the two multi-billion dollar LNG projects and take corrective action in the coming days.     

Let me reiterate in the strongest terms that I lead an inclusive and consultative government that will not fall back on the bad habits of governments that have been in power previously in PNG.

I am serious about the bigger interests of the nation - not corruption and vindictive personalised agenda of my ministers or persons who seek to actively use my ministers to further their deceptive agenda in the mining and petroleum industries in particular.

 

MINING SECTOR

 

We have world class gold, copper and nickel resources.

Ok Tedi gold and copper mine has been a mainstay of the PNG economy since independence.

Lihir gold mine has been a strong performer for our economy.

Wafi gold prospect has the resource potential to be the biggest gold and copper mine in the Southern Hemisphere.

This will further boost the PNG economy in the next 20 years. It will be a significant contributor to the government's coffers in the future.

Ramu nickel mine adds significant weight to the mineral resource boom now taking place in PNG. 

 

HYDROCARBON SECTOR

 

The two multi-billion dollar LNG projects – PNG LNG being developed by a consortium led by ExxonMobil and Oil Search Limited and Gulf LNG, being established by InterOil Corporation and its partners – both world class projects.

 These are projects with potential to create revenue in-flows for PNG like never before.

On August 9, I stated in my initial policy statement that every effort will be made by my government to assist these two projects to meet their initial production timelines in 2014.

My position has not changed.

I will ensure there are no political and bureaucratic interference in their progress.

All dealings with regard to these two projects shall be transparent and predictable. The importance of these two projects can neither be overstated nor understated.

To give these projects the prominence they deserve, I will dedicate a senior member of my staff in the coming days as a direct link in my office, whose job it will be to actively liaise directly with the responsible ministry, department and LNG Facilitation Office to ensure this two projects are not hampered in their progress by political and bureaucratic nepotism.

The PNG LNG project needs all the help that my government can give, and we shall do that as a matter of priority, to address all outstanding landowner issues and resolve them so that there are no further delays in progressing this project to production.

Similarly, my government will not tolerate any interference designed to delay progress of the Gulf LNG project. Gulf LNG is nearing a Final Invest Decision by the end of this year and all assistance will be given by my government to fulfil all their requirements to arrive at FID.

I want to see these two projects developed together.

 

RESPECTING FOREIGN INVESTMENT

 

In concluding, my government respects the commitment of foreign investment companies that have stayed loyal to PNG in both the good and bad economic times PNG has face since the early 1990s.

We welcome new foreign investment initiatives in our booming mining and petroleum sectors.

However, we would like to see that new investors and returning investors respect those that are already operating in PNG. We would like to see that potential investors come through the front door with their goodies.

 In all sincerity, the last thing we all want is to destabilise existing well-meaning investors who have long-haul interests and commitment as PNG's development partners.

My government believes in being predictable and forthright in our dealings with all foreign investors in our nation's various natural resource sectors.

Friday, September 09, 2011

Papua New Guinea community celebrates Independence Day in Toowoomba

 
Members of USQ's PNG community are inviting the Toowoomba community in Australia to celebrate their Independence Day this Saturday 10 September.
The day will commence at 11am, and will showcase PNG culture through dance, song and a variety of cultural displays.
Coordinator of the event, USQ PNG Students Association President, Matthew Igo Ball, said the day was an opportunity to celebrate the country's successes.
"PNG's Independence is a big part of the country's history and although they are still doing it tough back home, we are here at university because we want to better, not only ourselves but also our country,' Matthew said.
"Independence is a time to reflect how far we have come as a country and also as individuals."

Matthew said they are expecting PNG students from USQ and local boarding schools to attend the day, and were welcoming anyone who loves PNG or wants to learn more about its culture to attend.
"We are expecting PNG students from USQ, students from local boarding schools, the general PNG community residing in Toowoomba, a number of expatriates, and many PNG students and community members from Brisbane to attend on the day,"he said.
"Currently there are over 30 PNG students on-campus at Toowoomba. The general public are invited to the event, it is open to anyone who is from PNG, has been to PNG, knows a PNG, or wants to learn more about PNG."
"It will be a fun day for everyone."
WHAT: PNG 36th Independence Celebrations 
WHEN: 11- 2 on Saturday, 10 September 2011 
WHERE: USQ Quadrangle, USQ West Street Toowoomba 
COST: Free

Contact Details:
Connie-Louise Rego, USQ Media, +61 7 4631 2977

Thursday, September 08, 2011

Sepik people slam removal

THE people of East Sepik are disappointed that Sir Michael Somare has been unceremoniously dismissed as their representative in parliament, The National reports.
And they warned that such decisions against the people of East Sepik through their leader could have serious consequences.
East Sepik Parents Advocacy Forum chairman George Numbasa said more than 60% of Sepiks supported the government's policies but the attack on Sir Michael had created a dent in their confidence.
Hurung Holdings Ltd chairman Louis Koinduo said his people of Yangoru were not happy with the continuous intimidation of the Sepik people.
Youth leader David Ulga said the action would create disharmony among citizens.

East Sepik Province people urged to unite

THE people of East Sepik have been urged to unite to demonstrate that it is the people who brought Sir Michael Somare into parliament and not any political party, Valentine Kambori says, The National reports.
Kambori, a tribal leader of the Sausse tribe in Wewak, said in a statement that the announcement by the speaker in parliament to dismiss Sir Michael, should prompt all Sepik people to unite and tell Papua New Guinea that it was not the National Alliance or the Pangu Pati or any political party which brought Sir Michael to parliament.
"Sir Michael Somare's election to parliament since 1968 is the collective will and mandate of the Sepik people as ordained and bestowed by the forefathers of the Sepik people after World War 2 restoration when two prominent chiefs Sir Peter Simogun and Thomas Yawiga called on the Sepik people to unanimously vote young Michael Somare to take the place of the white man Frank Martin who was then the regional member," he said.
Kambori said the Speaker could use the technicalities of law to remove Sir Michael but the Sepik people would return him.
"I challenge the government to issue the writs next week and the Sepik people will return him again to parliament.
"The founding father of this nation is our paramount chief and he remains with our forefathers mandate until that mandate is passed on and I call upon all Sepik people throughout PNG and the province to unite to prove that Sir Michael is not dead and we will return him unopposed to prove our point.
"It must be known by Papua New Guinea that you do not remove our leader on technicalities in parliament especially the founding father.
"The Sepik leader is only removed at the ballot box by the will and mandate of the Sepik people," Kambori said
.

Polye faction calls for National Alliance executives' resignation

THE Polye faction of the National Alliance party in government yesterday called for the resignation of the
national executives of the party, The National reports.
Flanked by provincial party executives and 11 of the expelled MPs yesterday Polye called for the resignation of the national executives for "bringing the party to disrepute and for making ill-informed decisions to serve the interest of a few people".
He said the party executives were supporting a few corrupt members and not addressing important issues.
He said the party MPs with him in the Peter O'Neill-led government were "founders" of the NA which should have suspended Arthur Somare, Patrick Pruaitch, Sam Abal and Paul Teinsten because of their leadership conduct which he claimed were contrary to the party constitution and policies.
"The action to terminate the 20 members was a slap in the face of the people of PNG and, therefore, I call on the executives and the members implicated to resign," he said.
Polye said his group was committed to addressing corruption and transparency and those members in the opposition who wanted to fight corruption should cross over and join them.
He said the split in the NA camp started some years back as all activities and conduct of business were not in the best interest of the party and in
accordance with the policies and constitution of the party but for the benefit of a privileged few.
He said some decisions made by Grand Chief Sir Michael Somare had contributed to the downfall of the party.,
Polye said regular dialogue was being maintained with the  NA MPs in the opposition to unite the party and contest in next year's elections.
Meanwhile, five deputy presidents of the NA party, James Kond, highlands; Douglas Tomurisa, southern; John Tuka, islands; and council members John Tiberame and Charles Synell, islands have called
on the party's national executives to convene a special council meeting to address the issues.
They said the national executives did not have the power to terminate the members and that the resolution to expel 20 MPs did not follow the party constitution.
Spokesman Kond said a few issues such as the Special Supreme Court reference, the full-page advertorial by the NA president Simon Kaiwi and the decision to expel the 20 MPs should be addressed at the meeting.
He said the council should decide such penalties and not the national executives.
The group said the council recognised Polye as the  party leader after the party caucus in Banz.
Terence Perene and Gerry Eremoge NA chairman of Southern and Eastern Highlands committed their support for Polye.
They said Polye was the duly elected party leader during the absence of Sir Michael and the expulsion notice was misleading and not in the best interest to the party.

Philemon: NRL bid a waste of time, money

By JEFFREY ELAPA

THE K20 million allocated for the National Rugby League Bid is a waste of time and money, Public Service Minister Bart Philemon says, The National reports.
Philemon made the comment after the Pacific Games 2015 Authority Bill was passed in parliament on Tuesday, with 76 MPs voting for it.
Philemon said the NRL Bid was a failure while the Pacific Games was being neglected by the government.
He said PNG had bid in 2009 to host the 2015 Pacific Games and had assured the Games Council and the PNG Games Council that it would make available US$92.5 million for it.
He said the games was contested by more than 15 Pacific islands countries every four years.
He blamed the Somare government for failing to pass the bill and make budget allocation to prepare for the Games, which is expected to cost about K300 million.
Philemon said sport was important in uniting the country as evident during the 1991 South Pacific Games held at the then Waigani Stadium in Port Moresby.
He said the country had only three years to prepare and the onus was on the government to start now with the first budget allocation to be included in the 2011 supplementary budget.
He said a contract was already in place with the Pacific Games body, the PNG sport council and the government and that must be addressed by the government with the passing of the bill.

National Alliance split

By JEFFREY ELAPA

THE National Alliance party, Papua New Guinea's biggest political party, is in a crisis following the sacking of 20 parliamentarians who crossed the floor to join the new government, The National reports.
The party's national executives met on Tuesday after the sacking of their ailing parliamentary leader Grand Chief Sir Michael Somare and decided to expel all 20 MPs including Speaker Jeffery Nape and Finance and Treasury Minister Don Polye for "conducts prejudicial to the interest of the party".
The party, which ruled for nine consecutive years, is now split 20/21.
NA president Simon Kaiwi explained at a press conference that the actions were taken following the dumping of Sir Michael Somare, first as prime minister on Aug 2 and, on Tuesday, as regional member for East Sepik.
Kaiwi said the defectors had, by their decision, shown disrespect for the party, its leadership and constitution.
The NA group in government has until Sept 28, under the rules of the party, to appeal the decision.
Polye responded yesterday by calling on the national executives of the party to convene an urgent NA council meeting to discuss the issue.
He also called on the NA executive members to resign.
The national executive comprised Kaiwi, general secretary Stephen Pokawin, public officer Joyce Grant, treasurer Thomas Bullen and the parliamentary leader of the party.
The leadership post had become a contentious issue also with the executives claiming Sir Michael was still leader while other regional presidents and the defecting MPs claiming Polye was now the new leader.
Polye insisted yesterday he was the duly elected party leader and would remain in that position because he still had most of the NA MPs on his side.
He was proposed and accepted as the leader during the party caucus meeting in Minj last month.
Polye said he and his group had taken the decision they did because corruption and leadership issues were repeatedly ignored in the past.
The expulsion of Sir Michael as East Sepik MP was by operation of the law and not the work of any member of NA, he said.
 
SACKED MPs
1. Jeffery Nape – Parliament Speaker             
    (Sinasina-Yongomugl)
2. Don Polye – Treasurer (Kandep)
3. Ano Pala – Foreign Affairs (Rigo)
4. Mark Maipakai – Labour &
    Industrial Relations (Kikori)
5. Charles Abel – Commerce, Industry
    & Trade (Alotau)
6. Lucas Dekena – Lands & Physical
    Planning (Gumine),
7. Andrew Mald – Community
    Development (Moresby Northeast)
8. Sai Beseo – Correctional Services
    (Kainantu)
9. Sali Subam – Sports (South Fly)
10. David Arore – Higher Education,
      Science & Technology (Ijivitari)
11. Peter Humphreys – Governor
      (West New Britain)
12. Leo Dion – Governor (East
      New Britain)
13. John Luke Critten – Governor
      (Milne Bay)
14. Michael Sapau – Milne Bay
      (Manus)
15. Alphonse Moroi – Governor
      (Central)
16. James Gau – Governor (Madang,
      Raicoast MP)
17. Mathew Poiya – MP (Goilala)
18. Pitom Bombom – MP (Kerema)
19. Buka G Malai – MP (Madang)
20. Yawa Silupa – MP (Lufa)

Wednesday, September 07, 2011

Viewers decry MPs lack of respect

PEOPLE watching the live broadcast of the parliamentary sitting on Kundu 2 Television yesterday described the parliament as a "kindergarten", The National reports.
Two viewers said the leaders had shown no respect for parliament and turned it into a playground for a kindergarten.
Herman Paul, who watched the live broadcast yesterday afternoon at his house at Tarangau, in Mt Hagen, Western Highlands, said he could not understand why parliamentarians, especially those on the opposition, kept interrupting Speaker Jeffery Nape.
He said parliament "belongs to the six million people of this nation, the MPs are only their representatives and they must show their respect for the people of this nation".
Paul said the leaders must show respect for the house and follow standing orders.
Another viewer, Joejoe Miugle appealed to leaders to use their common sense and show respect for parliament
.

Groups arrive early to see parliament sit

By JULIA DAIA BORE

THE corner of Goodwit Road and John Guise Drive, in Waigani, converging onto the turn off into the National Parliament house was yesterday packed with people and traffic from about noon to 2pm, The National reports.
Police controlled traffic and people started moving around outside the National Library and National Archives buildings from 8am, although parliament was scheduled to begin at 2pm to discuss among other things a proposed law on women's reserved seats.
Women in PNG coloured outfits — meri blouses and T-shirts — were seated or standing in groups and their leaders advising them that only their spokeswomen would go for the sitting.
Closer to the roundabout, an even bigger crowd, including children, were assembled with their leaders briefing them on loudspeakers about the issues to be dealt with in parliament.
The traffic between 1pm and 2pm was heavy along roads into the National Parliament house.
Meanwhile, the bill to reserve the 22 parliamentary seats went through a second reading yesterday in parliament.

Provincial seats returned

By JEFFREY ELAPA

THE parliament has voted to return the provincial electoral seats during the 2012 general election with the blessing of 73 MPs yesterday, The National reports.
Parliament had decided a few years ago that all provincial seats were to be abolished by 2012 and to increase the open seats to 120 from 89 but parliament yesterday unanimously voted to keep all provincial seats when the bill went through the second reading. 
The final reading is expected after two months and this might bring more debates in parliament.
Prime Minister Peter O'Neill said it was an important bill as the constitutional amendment would ensure that provincial electorates were permanently re-instated.
He said by committing the bill and holding two separate votes, parliament changed the commencement date of the constitutional amendment.
He said instead of provincial electorates been removed at the 2007 election, they would be removed when advised by the prime minister and by recommitting the law, a constitutional crisis was avoided.
However, he said the job of returning provincial electorates was not yet complete and in order to finish the job, parliament needed to pass the amendment. Only after the passage of the law, will the law be returned to its original format and provincial electorates will be permanently reinstated.
He said provincial government served an important function in the decentralised system and that the provincial government system allowed rural people to become involved in decision-making.
O'Neill said the effect of the amendment was to reinstate all references to provincial electorates back into the constitution and ensure the constitution was the same way our founding fathers had intended.
The parliament also passed the 2015 South Pacific games Bill which will establish the 2015 Pacific Games authority to oversee and prepare for the games. The games is expected to cost around K300 million
.

National Alliance in crisis

THE National Alliance executive was in a crisis conference last night as its former leader was dismissed from parliament by the speaker who is a member of the party, The National reports.
The ouster of Grand Chief Sir Michael Somare as prime minister was supported by new NA leader Don Polye, and the declaration of a vacancy was by Speaker Jeffery Nape.
The party is expected to make a major announcement today on the proceedings of the one-day parliament sitting yesterday.
The party executives were last night seeking legal opinion on whether what transpired was right by law and complied with the standing orders of parliament.
NA president Simon Kaiwi said last night: "The decision that the speaker has taken is a big constitutional issue and an issue with standing orders of parliament.
"I do not think it is correct but we are seeking legal opinion before we tell the people of PNG.
"He (Sir Michael) has met the legal requirement. He presented himself to parliament yesterday. Then, he is dismissed.
"It is a big shock to us.
"They are treating him like somebody who just came in yesterday."
Kaiwi's dilemma had worsened since half of his NA members are with the government that ousted Sir Michael as prime minister and MP
.

Speaker’s decision shocks opposition

By ISAAC NICHOLAS

FORMER government frontbenchers expressed shock over the decision to remove the nation's "founding father" by Parliament Speaker Jeffrey Nape yesterday, The National reports.
The group was in the middle of a joint media conference when a tearful Dame Carol Kidu arrived to announce that Sir Michael had been removed.
Madang MP Sir Arnold Amet, East Sepik Governor Peter Wararu, Angoram MP Arthur Somare, Aitape-Lumi MP Patrick Pruaitch, Kompiam-Ambum MP John Pundari and Nipa-Kutubu MP Philemon Embel expressed shock and anger.
Sir Arnold indicated that he would institute a contempt of court action against Nape, claiming that the speaker was trying to legitimise the illegal takeover of a legitimate government on Aug 2.
Nape's announcement yesterday was contrary to the advice given by  the clerk to parliament, Don Pandan, who yesterday advised lawyers for Sir Michael, Posman Kua Aisi Lawyers, that Sir Michael would avoid being absent from three consecutive meetings of parliament if he attended yesterday's session.
Pandan, in a letter dated Sept 6, 2011, stated; "I confirm that my records constituting the minutes of proceedings of the parliament, as required by Standing Orders 30 for 2011, show that Sir Michael has been absent for only the June and August 2011 meetings of parliament. He was granted leave by parliament for the May 2011 meeting.
"I confirm that when Sir Michael attends today's (yesterday) meeting of parliament, he will avoid being absent for three consecutive meetings of parliament, thus, being disqualified as the member of parliament for the East Sepik regional seat, pursuant to the requirements of section 104(2) d) of the Constitution."
Angoram MP Arthur Somare promised to bring his father to parliament during the Sept 20 sitting and challenged government leaders to try to stop him.
He said the significant issue was that they wanted the Grand Chief to come and present himself in parliament to preserve the East Sepik regional seat.
He said the people of East Sepik had given Sir Michael their mandate for 45 years and he had an unbroken record of holding the parliamentary seat for an extended period of time.
He said to witness his arrival in parliament yesterday was heartening.
"If he has missed three consecutive meetings, he will be disqualified and leave the seat vacant," Somare said.
He said the speaker had recognised and welcomed back the Grand Chief to parliament.
"We feel confident that there is no vacancy in the East Sepik provincial seat because the custodian of records is the clerk of parliament."
Wabag MP Sam Abal said the actions of the speaker showed that power-hungry leaders were trying to destroy a man who had served the country for 45 years.
East Sepik Governor Peter Wararu said it was a sad day for the people of East Sepik that the founding father of the nation had been treated in such a way.
"Today, they had confirmed that their real motive is to remove the Grand Chief as East Sepik regional MP during this urgent recall of parliament.
"Addressing outstanding issues was just a cover-up," Wararu said.